- Home
- RFC 9113
RFC 9113: HTTP/2
- M. Thomson, Ed.,
- C. Benfield, Ed.
Abstract
This specification describes an optimized expression of the semantics of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), referred to as HTTP version 2 (HTTP/2). HTTP/2 enables a more efficient use of network resources and a reduced latency by introducing field compression and allowing multiple concurrent exchanges on the same connection.¶
This document obsoletes RFCs 7540 and 8740.¶
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.¶
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.¶
Information about the current status of this document, any
errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://
1. Introduction
The performance of applications using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP, [HTTP]) is linked to how each version of HTTP uses the underlying transport, and the conditions under which the transport operates.¶
Making multiple concurrent requests can reduce latency and improve
application performance. HTTP/1.0 allowed only one request to be
outstanding at a time on a given TCP [TCP] connection. HTTP/1.1 [HTTP/1.1]
added request pipelining, but this only partially addressed request
concurrency and still suffers from application
Furthermore, HTTP fields are often repetitive and verbose, causing unnecessary network traffic as well as causing the initial TCP congestion window to quickly fill. This can result in excessive latency when multiple requests are made on a new TCP connection.¶
HTTP/2 addresses these issues by defining an optimized mapping of HTTP's semantics to an underlying connection. Specifically, it allows interleaving of messages on the same connection and uses an efficient coding for HTTP fields. It also allows prioritization of requests, letting more important requests complete more quickly, further improving performance.¶
The resulting protocol is more friendly to the network because fewer TCP connections can be used in comparison to HTTP/1.x. This means less competition with other flows and longer-lived connections, which in turn lead to better utilization of available network capacity. Note, however, that TCP head-of-line blocking is not addressed by this protocol.¶
Finally, HTTP/2 also enables more efficient processing of messages through use of binary message framing.¶
This document obsoletes RFCs 7540 and 8740. Appendix B lists notable changes.¶
2. HTTP/2 Protocol Overview
HTTP/2 provides an optimized transport for HTTP semantics. HTTP/2 supports all of the core features of HTTP but aims to be more efficient than HTTP/1.1.¶
HTTP/2 is a connection
The basic protocol unit in HTTP/2 is a frame (Section 4.1). Each frame
type serves a different purpose. For example, HEADERS and
DATA frames form the basis of HTTP requests and
responses (Section 8.1); other frame types like SETTINGS,
WINDOW_
Multiplexing of requests is achieved by having each HTTP request
Effective use of multiplexing depends on flow control and prioritization. Flow control (Section 5.2) ensures that it is possible to efficiently use multiplexed streams by restricting data that is transmitted to what the receiver is able to handle. Prioritization (Section 5.3) ensures that limited resources are used most effectively. This revision of HTTP/2 deprecates the priority signaling scheme from [RFC7540].¶
Because HTTP fields used in a connection can contain large amounts of redundant data, frames that contain them are compressed (Section 4.3). This has especially advantageous impact upon request sizes in the common case, allowing many requests to be compressed into one packet.¶
Finally, HTTP/2 adds a new, optional interaction mode whereby a server can push
responses to a client (Section 8.4). This is intended to allow a server to speculatively send data to a
client that the server anticipates the client will need, trading off some network usage
against a potential latency gain. The server does this by synthesizing a request, which it
sends as a PUSH_
2.1. Document Organization
The HTTP/2 specification is split into four parts:¶
- Starting HTTP/2 (Section 3) covers how an HTTP/2 connection is initiated.¶
- The frame (Section 4) and stream (Section 5) layers describe the way HTTP/2 frames are structured and formed into multiplexed streams.¶
- Frame (Section 6) and error (Section 7) definitions include details of the frame and error types used in HTTP/2.¶
- HTTP mappings (Section 8) and additional requirements (Section 9) describe how HTTP semantics are expressed using frames and streams.¶
While some of the frame- and stream-layer concepts are isolated from HTTP, this specification does not define a completely generic frame layer. The frame and stream layers are tailored to the needs of HTTP.¶
2.2. Conventions and Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
All numeric values are in network byte order. Values are unsigned unless otherwise
indicated. Literal values are provided in decimal or hexadecimal as appropriate.
Hexadecimal literals are prefixed with "0x" to distinguish them
from decimal literals.¶
This specification describes binary formats using the conventions described in Section 1.3 of RFC 9000 [QUIC]. Note that this format uses network byte order and that high-valued bits are listed before low-valued bits.¶
The following terms are used:¶
- client:
- The endpoint that initiates an HTTP/2 connection. Clients send HTTP requests and receive HTTP responses.¶
- connection:
- A transport-layer connection between two endpoints.¶
- connection error:
- An error that affects the entire HTTP/2 connection.¶
- endpoint:
- Either the client or server of the connection.¶
- frame:
- The smallest unit of communication within an HTTP/2 connection, consisting of a header and a variable-length sequence of octets structured according to the frame type.¶
- peer:
- An endpoint. When discussing a particular endpoint, "peer" refers to the endpoint that is remote to the primary subject of discussion.¶
- receiver:
- An endpoint that is receiving frames.¶
- sender:
- An endpoint that is transmitting frames.¶
- server:
- The endpoint that accepts an HTTP/2 connection. Servers receive HTTP requests and send HTTP responses.¶
- stream:
- A bidirectional flow of frames within the HTTP/2 connection.¶
- stream error:
- An error on the individual HTTP/2 stream.¶
Finally, the terms "gateway", "intermediary", "proxy", and "tunnel" are defined in Section 3.7 of [HTTP]. Intermediaries act as both client and server at different times.¶
The term "content" as it applies to message bodies is defined in Section 6.4 of [HTTP].¶
3. Starting HTTP/2
Implementations that generate HTTP requests need to discover whether a server supports HTTP/2.¶
HTTP/2 uses the "http" and "https" URI schemes defined in Section 4.2 of [HTTP], with the same default port numbers as HTTP/1.1 [HTTP/1.1]. These URIs do not include any indication about what HTTP versions an
upstream server (the immediate peer to which the client wishes to establish a connection)
supports.¶
The means by which support for HTTP/2 is determined is different for "http" and "https"
URIs. Discovery for "https" URIs is described in Section 3.2. HTTP/2
support for "http" URIs can only be discovered by out-of-band means and requires prior knowledge
of the support as described in Section 3.3.¶
3.1. HTTP/2 Version Identification
The protocol defined in this document has two identifiers. Creating a connection based on either implies the use of the transport, framing, and message semantics described in this document.¶
-
The string "h2" identifies the protocol where HTTP/2 uses Transport Layer Security (TLS); see Section 9.2. This identifier is used in the TLS Application
-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) extension [TLS-ALPN] field and in any place where HTTP/2 over TLS is identified.¶The "h2" string is serialized into an ALPN protocol identifier as the two-octet sequence: 0x68, 0x32.¶
-
The "h2c" string was previously used as a token for use in the HTTP Upgrade mechanism's Upgrade header field (Section 7.8 of [HTTP]). This usage was never widely deployed and is deprecated by this document. The same applies to the HTTP2-Settings header field, which was used with the upgrade to "h2c".¶
3.2. Starting HTTP/2 for "https" URIs
A client that makes a request to an "https" URI uses TLS [TLS13] with
the ALPN extension [TLS-ALPN].¶
HTTP/2 over TLS uses the "h2" protocol identifier. The "h2c" protocol identifier MUST NOT be sent by a client or selected by a server; the "h2c" protocol identifier describes a protocol that does not use TLS.¶
Once TLS negotiation is complete, both the client and the server MUST send a connection preface (Section 3.4).¶
3.3. Starting HTTP/2 with Prior Knowledge
A client can learn that a particular server supports HTTP/2 by other means. For example, a client could be configured with knowledge that a server supports HTTP/2.¶
A client that knows that a server supports HTTP/2 can establish a TCP connection and send the connection preface (Section 3.4) followed by HTTP/2 frames. Servers can identify these connections by the presence of the connection preface. This only affects the establishment of HTTP/2 connections over cleartext TCP; HTTP/2 connections over TLS MUST use protocol negotiation in TLS [TLS-ALPN].¶
Likewise, the server MUST send a connection preface (Section 3.4).¶
Without additional information, prior support for HTTP/2 is not a strong signal that a given server will support HTTP/2 for future connections. For example, it is possible for server configurations to change, for configurations to differ between instances in clustered servers, or for network conditions to change.¶
3.4. HTTP/2 Connection Preface
In HTTP/2, each endpoint is required to send a connection preface as a final confirmation of the protocol in use and to establish the initial settings for the HTTP/2 connection. The client and server each send a different connection preface.¶
The client connection preface starts with a sequence of 24 octets, which in hex notation is:¶
0x505249202a20485454502f322e300d0a0d0a534d0d0a0d0a
That is, the connection preface starts with the string "PRI *
HTTP". This sequence
MUST be followed by a SETTINGS frame (Section 6.5), which
MAY be empty. The client sends the client connection preface as the first
application data octets of a connection.¶
The server connection preface consists of a potentially empty SETTINGS frame (Section 6.5) that MUST be the first frame the server sends in the HTTP/2 connection.¶
The SETTINGS frames received from a peer as part of the connection preface MUST be acknowledged (see Section 6.5.3) after sending the connection preface.¶
To avoid unnecessary latency, clients are permitted to send additional frames to the server immediately after sending the client connection preface, without waiting to receive the server connection preface. It is important to note, however, that the server connection preface SETTINGS frame might include settings that necessarily alter how a client is expected to communicate with the server. Upon receiving the SETTINGS frame, the client is expected to honor any settings established. In some configurations, it is possible for the server to transmit SETTINGS before the client sends additional frames, providing an opportunity to avoid this issue.¶
Clients and servers MUST treat an invalid connection preface as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
4. HTTP Frames
Once the HTTP/2 connection is established, endpoints can begin exchanging frames.¶
4.1. Frame Format
All frames begin with a fixed 9-octet header followed by a variable-length frame payload.¶
HTTP Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8),
Flags (8),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
Frame Payload (..),
}
The fields of the frame header are defined as:¶
- Length:
-
The length of the frame payload expressed as an unsigned 24-bit integer in units of octets. Values greater than 214 (16,384) MUST NOT be sent unless the receiver has set a larger value for SETTINGS_
MAX_ .¶FRAME_ SIZE The 9 octets of the frame header are not included in this value.¶
- Type:
-
The 8-bit type of the frame. The frame type determines the format and semantics of the frame. Frames defined in this document are listed in Section 6. Implementations MUST ignore and discard frames of unknown types.¶
- Flags:
-
An 8-bit field reserved for boolean flags specific to the frame type.¶
Flags are assigned semantics specific to the indicated frame type. Unused flags are those that have no defined semantics for a particular frame type. Unused flags MUST be ignored on receipt and MUST be left unset (0x00) when sending.¶
- Reserved:
-
A reserved 1-bit field. The semantics of this bit are undefined, and the bit MUST remain unset (0x00) when sending and MUST be ignored when receiving.¶
- Stream Identifier:
-
A stream identifier (see Section 5.1.1) expressed as an unsigned 31-bit integer. The value 0x00 is reserved for frames that are associated with the connection as a whole as opposed to an individual stream.¶
The structure and content of the frame payload are dependent entirely on the frame type.¶
4.2. Frame Size
The size of a frame payload is limited by the maximum size that a receiver advertises in
the SETTINGS_
All implementations MUST be capable of receiving and minimally processing frames up to 214 octets in length, plus the 9-octet frame header (Section 4.1). The size of the frame header is not included when describing frame sizes.¶
An endpoint MUST send an error code of FRAME_
Endpoints are not obligated to use all available space in a frame. Responsiveness can be
improved by using frames that are smaller than the permitted maximum size. Sending large
frames can result in delays in sending time-sensitive frames (such as
RST_
4.3. Field Section Compression and Decompression
Field section compression is the process of compressing a set of field lines (Section 5.2 of [HTTP]) to form a field block. Field section decompression is the process of decoding a field block into a set of field lines. Details of HTTP/2 field section compression and decompression are defined in [COMPRESSION], which, for historical reasons, refers to these processes as header compression and decompression.¶
Each field block carries all of the compressed field lines of a single field section. Header sections also include control data associated with the message in the form of pseudo-header fields (Section 8.3) that use the same format as a field line.¶
Field blocks carry control data and header sections for requests, responses, promised
requests, and pushed responses (see Section 8.4). All these messages,
except for interim responses and requests contained in PUSH_
A field section is a collection of field lines. Each of the field lines in a
field block carries a single value. The serialized field block is then divided into one or
more octet sequences, called field block fragments. The first field block fragment is transmitted within the frame
payload of HEADERS (Section 6.2) or PUSH_
The Cookie header field [COOKIE] is treated specially by the HTTP mapping (see Section 8.2.3).¶
A receiving endpoint reassembles the field block by concatenating its fragments and then decompresses the block to reconstruct the field section.¶
A complete field section consists of either:¶
- a single HEADERS or PUSH_
PROMISE frame, with the END_HEADERS flag set, or¶ - a HEADERS or PUSH_
PROMISE frame with the END_HEADERS flag unset and one or more CONTINUATION frames, where the last CONTINUATION frame has the END_ HEADERS flag set.¶
Each field block is processed as a discrete unit.
Field blocks MUST be transmitted as a contiguous sequence of frames, with no interleaved
frames of any other type or from any other stream. The last frame in a sequence of
HEADERS or CONTINUATION frames has the END_
Field block fragments can only be sent as the frame payload of HEADERS,
PUSH_
A decoding error in a field block MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type COMPRESSION_
4.3.1. Compression State
Field compression is stateful. Each endpoint has an HPACK encoder context and an HPACK decoder context that are used for encoding and decoding all field blocks on a connection. Section 4 of [COMPRESSION] defines the dynamic table, which is the primary state for each context.¶
The dynamic table has a maximum size that is set by an HPACK decoder. An endpoint
communicates the size chosen by its HPACK decoder context using the
SETTINGS_
Any change to the maximum value set using SETTINGS_
Once an endpoint acknowledges a change to SETTINGS_
5. Streams and Multiplexing
A "stream" is an independent, bidirectional sequence of frames exchanged between the client
and server within an HTTP/2 connection. Streams have several important characteristics
- A single HTTP/2 connection can contain multiple concurrently open streams, with either endpoint interleaving frames from multiple streams.¶
- Streams can be established and used unilaterally or shared by either endpoint.¶
- Streams can be closed by either endpoint.¶
- The order in which frames are sent is significant. Recipients process frames in the order they are received. In particular, the order of HEADERS and DATA frames is semantically significant.¶
- Streams are identified by an integer. Stream identifiers are assigned to streams by the endpoint initiating the stream.¶
5.1. Stream States
The lifecycle of a stream is shown in Figure 2.¶
-
send: - endpoint sends this frame¶
-
recv: - endpoint receives this frame¶
-
H: - HEADERS frame (with implied CONTINUATION frames)¶
-
ES: - END_
STREAM flag¶ -
R: -
RST_
STREAM frame¶ -
PP: -
PUSH_
PROMISE frame (with implied CONTINUATION frames); state transitions are for the promised stream¶
Note that this diagram shows stream state transitions and the frames and flags that affect
those transitions only. In this regard, CONTINUATION frames do not result
in state transitions; they are effectively part of the HEADERS or
PUSH_
Both endpoints have a subjective view of the state of a stream that could be different
when frames are in transit. Endpoints do not coordinate the creation of streams; they are
created unilaterally by either endpoint. The negative consequences of a mismatch in
states are limited to the "closed" state after sending RST_
Streams have the following states:¶
- idle:
-
All streams start in the "idle" state.¶
The following transitions are valid from this state:¶
- Sending a HEADERS frame as a client, or receiving a HEADERS frame as a server, causes the stream to become "open". The stream identifier is selected as described in Section 5.1.1. The same HEADERS frame can also cause a stream to immediately become "half-closed".¶
- Sending a PUSH_
PROMISE frame on another stream reserves the idle stream that is identified for later use. The stream state for the reserved stream transitions to "reserved (local)". Only a server may send PUSH_PROMISE frames.¶ - Receiving a PUSH_
PROMISE frame on another stream reserves an idle stream that is identified for later use. The stream state for the reserved stream transitions to "reserved (remote)". Only a client may receive PUSH_PROMISE frames.¶ - Note that the PUSH_
PROMISE frame is not sent on the idle stream but references the newly reserved stream in the Promised Stream ID field.¶ - Opening a stream with a higher-valued stream identifier causes the stream to transition immediately to a "closed" state; note that this transition is not shown in the diagram.¶
Receiving any frame other than HEADERS or PRIORITY on a stream in this state MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
ERROR . If this stream is initiated by the server, as described in Section 5.1.1, then receiving a HEADERS frame MUST also be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR .¶ - reserved (local):
-
A stream in the "reserved (local)" state is one that has been promised by sending a PUSH_
PROMISE frame. A PUSH_PROMISE frame reserves an idle stream by associating the stream with an open stream that was initiated by the remote peer (see Section 8.4).¶In this state, only the following transitions are possible:¶
- The endpoint can send a HEADERS frame. This causes the stream to open in a "half-closed (remote)" state.¶
- Either endpoint can send a RST_
STREAM frame to cause the stream to become "closed". This releases the stream reservation.¶
An endpoint MUST NOT send any type of frame other than HEADERS, RST_
STREAM , or PRIORITY in this state.¶A PRIORITY or WINDOW_
UPDATE frame MAY be received in this state. Receiving any type of frame other than RST_STREAM , PRIORITY, or WINDOW_UPDATE on a stream in this state MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR .¶ - reserved (remote):
-
A stream in the "reserved (remote)" state has been reserved by a remote peer.¶
In this state, only the following transitions are possible:¶
- Receiving a HEADERS frame causes the stream to transition to "half-closed (local)".¶
- Either endpoint can send a RST_
STREAM frame to cause the stream to become "closed". This releases the stream reservation.¶
An endpoint MUST NOT send any type of frame other than RST_
STREAM , WINDOW_UPDATE , or PRIORITY in this state.¶Receiving any type of frame other than HEADERS, RST_
STREAM , or PRIORITY on a stream in this state MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR .¶ - open:
-
A stream in the "open" state may be used by both peers to send frames of any type. In this state, sending peers observe advertised stream-level flow-control limits (Section 5.2).¶
From this state, either endpoint can send a frame with an END_
STREAM flag set, which causes the stream to transition into one of the "half-closed" states. An endpoint sending an END_ STREAM flag causes the stream state to become "half-closed (local)"; an endpoint receiving an END_ STREAM flag causes the stream state to become "half-closed (remote)".¶ Either endpoint can send a RST_
STREAM frame from this state, causing it to transition immediately to "closed".¶ - half-closed (local):
-
A stream that is in the "half-closed (local)" state cannot be used for sending frames other than WINDOW_
UPDATE , PRIORITY, and RST_STREAM .¶A stream transitions from this state to "closed" when a frame is received with the END_
STREAM flag set or when either peer sends a RST_ STREAM frame.¶An endpoint can receive any type of frame in this state. Providing flow-control credit using WINDOW_
UPDATE frames is necessary to continue receiving flow-controlled frames. In this state, a receiver can ignore WINDOW_UPDATE frames, which might arrive for a short period after a frame with the END_STREAM flag set is sent.¶ - half-closed (remote):
-
A stream that is "half-closed (remote)" is no longer being used by the peer to send frames. In this state, an endpoint is no longer obligated to maintain a receiver flow-control window.¶
If an endpoint receives additional frames, other than WINDOW_
UPDATE , PRIORITY, or RST_STREAM , for a stream that is in this state, it MUST respond with a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type STREAM_CLOSED .¶A stream that is "half-closed (remote)" can be used by the endpoint to send frames of any type. In this state, the endpoint continues to observe advertised stream-level flow-control limits (Section 5.2).¶
A stream can transition from this state to "closed" by sending a frame with the END_
STREAM flag set or when either peer sends a RST_ STREAM frame.¶ - closed:
-
The "closed" state is the terminal state.¶
A stream enters the "closed" state after an endpoint both sends and receives a frame with an END_
STREAM flag set. A stream also enters the "closed" state after an endpoint either sends or receives a RST_ STREAM frame.¶An endpoint MUST NOT send frames other than PRIORITY on a closed stream. An endpoint MAY treat receipt of any other type of frame on a closed stream as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type STREAM_
CLOSED , except as noted below.¶An endpoint that sends a frame with the END_
STREAM flag set or a RST_ STREAM frame might receive a WINDOW_UPDATE or RST_STREAM frame from its peer in the time before the peer receives and processes the frame that closes the stream.¶An endpoint that sends a RST_
STREAM frame on a stream that is in the "open" or "half-closed (local)" state could receive any type of frame. The peer might have sent or enqueued for sending these frames before processing the RST_STREAM frame. An endpoint MUST minimally process and then discard any frames it receives in this state. This means updating header compression state for HEADERS and PUSH_PROMISE frames. Receiving a PUSH_PROMISE frame also causes the promised stream to become "reserved (remote)", even when the PUSH_PROMISE frame is received on a closed stream. Additionally, the content of DATA frames counts toward the connection flow-control window.¶An endpoint can perform this minimal processing for all streams that are in the "closed" state. Endpoints MAY use other signals to detect that a peer has received the frames that caused the stream to enter the "closed" state and treat receipt of any frame other than PRIORITY as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
ERROR . Endpoints can use frames that indicate that the peer has received the closing signal to drive this. Endpoints SHOULD NOT use timers for this purpose. For example, an endpoint that sends a SETTINGS frame after closing a stream can safely treat receipt of a DATA frame on that stream as an error after receiving an acknowledgment of the settings. Other things that might be used are PING frames, receiving data on streams that were created after closing the stream, or responses to requests created after closing the stream.¶
In the absence of more specific rules, implementations SHOULD treat the receipt of a frame
that is not expressly permitted in the description of a state as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
The rules in this section only apply to frames defined in this document. Receipt of frames for which the semantics are unknown cannot be treated as an error, as the conditions for sending and receiving those frames are also unknown; see Section 5.5.¶
An example of the state transitions for an HTTP request
5.1.1. Stream Identifiers
Streams are identified by an unsigned 31-bit integer. Streams initiated by a client MUST use odd-numbered stream identifiers; those initiated by the server MUST use even-numbered stream identifiers. A stream identifier of zero (0x00) is used for connection control messages; the stream identifier of zero cannot be used to establish a new stream.¶
The identifier of a newly established stream MUST be numerically greater than all
streams that the initiating endpoint has opened or reserved. This governs streams that
are opened using a HEADERS frame and streams that are reserved using
PUSH_
A HEADERS frame will transition the client
Stream identifiers cannot be reused. Long-lived connections can result in an endpoint exhausting the available range of stream identifiers. A client that is unable to establish a new stream identifier can establish a new connection for new streams. A server that is unable to establish a new stream identifier can send a GOAWAY frame so that the client is forced to open a new connection for new streams.¶
5.1.2. Stream Concurrency
A peer can limit the number of concurrently active streams using the
SETTINGS_
Streams that are in the "open" state or in either of the "half-closed" states count toward
the maximum number of streams that an endpoint is permitted to open. Streams in any of
these three states count toward the limit advertised in the
SETTINGS_
Endpoints MUST NOT exceed the limit set by their peer. An endpoint that receives a
HEADERS frame that causes its advertised concurrent stream limit to be
exceeded MUST treat this as a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of
type PROTOCOL_
An endpoint that wishes to reduce the value of
SETTINGS_
5.2. Flow Control
Using streams for multiplexing introduces contention over use of the TCP connection, resulting in blocked streams. A flow-control scheme ensures that streams on the same connection do not destructively interfere with each other. Flow control is used for both individual streams and the connection as a whole.¶
HTTP/2 provides for flow control through use of the WINDOW_
5.2.1. Flow-Control Principles
HTTP/2 stream flow control aims to allow a variety of flow-control algorithms to be
used without requiring protocol changes. Flow control in HTTP/2 has the following
characteristics
- Flow control is specific to a connection. HTTP/2 flow control operates between the endpoints of a single hop and not over the entire end-to-end path.¶
- Flow control is based on WINDOW_
UPDATE frames. Receivers advertise how many octets they are prepared to receive on a stream and for the entire connection. This is a credit-based scheme.¶ - Flow control is directional with overall control provided by the receiver. A receiver MAY choose to set any window size that it desires for each stream and for the entire connection. A sender MUST respect flow-control limits imposed by a receiver. Clients, servers, and intermediaries all independently advertise their flow-control window as a receiver and abide by the flow-control limits set by their peer when sending.¶
- The initial value for the flow-control window is 65,535 octets for both new streams and the overall connection.¶
- The frame type determines whether flow control applies to a frame. Of the frames specified in this document, only DATA frames are subject to flow control; all other frame types do not consume space in the advertised flow-control window. This ensures that important control frames are not blocked by flow control.¶
- An endpoint can choose to disable its own flow control, but an endpoint cannot ignore flow-control signals from its peer.¶
- HTTP/2 defines only the format and semantics of the WINDOW_
UPDATE frame (Section 6.9). This document does not stipulate how a receiver decides when to send this frame or the value that it sends, nor does it specify how a sender chooses to send packets. Implementations are able to select any algorithm that suits their needs.¶
Implementations are also responsible for prioritizing the sending of requests and responses, choosing how to avoid head-of-line blocking for requests, and managing the creation of new streams. Algorithm choices for these could interact with any flow-control algorithm.¶
5.2.2. Appropriate Use of Flow Control
Flow control is defined to protect endpoints that are operating under resource constraints. For example, a proxy needs to share memory between many connections and also might have a slow upstream connection and a fast downstream one. Flow control addresses cases where the receiver is unable to process data on one stream yet wants to continue to process other streams in the same connection.¶
Deployments that do not require this capability can advertise a flow-control window of
the maximum size (231-1) and can maintain this window by sending a
WINDOW_
Deployments with constrained resources (for example, memory) can employ flow control to limit the amount of memory a peer can consume. Note, however, that this can lead to suboptimal use of available network resources if flow control is enabled without knowledge of the bandwidth * delay product (see [RFC7323]).¶
Even with full awareness of the current bandwidth * delay product, implementation of
flow control can be difficult. Endpoints MUST read and process HTTP/2 frames from the
TCP receive buffer as soon as data is available. Failure to read promptly could lead to
a deadlock when critical frames, such as WINDOW_
5.2.3. Flow-Control Performance
If an endpoint cannot ensure that its peer always has available flow-control window space that is greater than the peer's bandwidth * delay product on this connection, its receive throughput will be limited by HTTP/2 flow control. This will result in degraded performance.¶
Sending timely WINDOW_
5.3. Prioritization
In a multiplexed protocol like HTTP/2, prioritizing allocation of bandwidth and computation resources to streams can be critical to attaining good performance. A poor prioritization scheme can result in HTTP/2 providing poor performance. With no parallelism at the TCP layer, performance could be significantly worse than HTTP/1.1.¶
A good prioritization scheme benefits from the application of contextual knowledge such as the content of resources, how resources are interrelated, and how those resources will be used by a peer. In particular, clients can possess knowledge about the priority of requests that is relevant to server prioritization. In those cases, having clients provide priority information can improve performance.¶
5.3.1. Background on Priority in RFC 7540
RFC 7540 defined a rich system for signaling priority of requests. However, this system proved to be complex, and it was not uniformly implemented.¶
The flexible scheme meant that it was possible for clients to express priorities in very different ways, with little consistency in the approaches that were adopted. For servers, implementing generic support for the scheme was complex. Implementation of priorities was uneven in both clients and servers. Many server deployments ignored client signals when prioritizing their handling of requests.¶
In short, the prioritization signaling in RFC 7540 [RFC7540] was not successful.¶
5.3.2. Priority Signaling in This Document
This update to HTTP/2 deprecates the priority signaling defined in RFC 7540 [RFC7540]. The bulk of the text related to priority signals is not included in this document. The description of frame fields and some of the mandatory handling is retained to ensure that implementations of this document remain interoperable with implementations that use the priority signaling described in RFC 7540.¶
A thorough description of the RFC 7540 priority scheme remains in Section 5.3 of [RFC7540].¶
Signaling priority information is necessary to attain good performance in many cases. Where signaling priority information is important, endpoints are encouraged to use an alternative scheme, such as the scheme described in [HTTP-PRIORITY].¶
Though the priority signaling from RFC 7540 was not widely adopted, the information it provides can still be useful in the absence of better information. Endpoints that receive priority signals in HEADERS or PRIORITY frames can benefit from applying that information. In particular, implementations that consume these signals would not benefit from discarding these priority signals in the absence of alternatives.¶
Servers SHOULD use other contextual information in determining priority of requests in the absence of any priority signals. Servers MAY interpret the complete absence of signals as an indication that the client has not implemented the feature. The defaults described in Section 5.3.5 of [RFC7540] are known to have poor performance under most conditions, and their use is unlikely to be deliberate.¶
5.4. Error Handling
HTTP/2 framing permits two classes of errors:¶
- An error condition that renders the entire connection unusable is a connection error.¶
- An error in an individual stream is a stream error.¶
A list of error codes is included in Section 7.¶
It is possible that an endpoint will encounter frames that would cause multiple errors. Implementations MAY discover multiple errors during processing, but they SHOULD report at most one stream and one connection error as a result.¶
The first stream error reported for a given stream prevents any other errors on that stream from being reported.
In comparison, the protocol permits multiple GOAWAY frames, though an
endpoint SHOULD report just one type of connection error unless an error is encountered during graceful shutdown.
If this occurs, an endpoint MAY send an additional GOAWAY frame with the new error code, in addition to any prior
GOAWAY that contained NO_
If an endpoint detects multiple different errors, it MAY choose to report any one of those
errors. If a frame causes a connection error, that error MUST be reported. Additionally,
an endpoint MAY use any applicable error code when it detects an error condition; a
generic error code (such as PROTOCOL_
5.4.1. Connection Error Handling
A connection error is any error that prevents further processing of the frame layer or corrupts any connection state.¶
An endpoint that encounters a connection error SHOULD first send a GOAWAY frame (Section 6.8) with the stream identifier of the last stream that it successfully received from its peer. The GOAWAY frame includes an error code (Section 7) that indicates why the connection is terminating. After sending the GOAWAY frame for an error condition, the endpoint MUST close the TCP connection.¶
It is possible that the GOAWAY will not be reliably received by the receiving endpoint. In the event of a connection error, GOAWAY only provides a best-effort attempt to communicate with the peer about why the connection is being terminated.¶
An endpoint can end a connection at any time. In particular, an endpoint MAY choose to treat a stream error as a connection error. Endpoints SHOULD send a GOAWAY frame when ending a connection, providing that circumstances permit it.¶
5.4.2. Stream Error Handling
A stream error is an error related to a specific stream that does not affect processing of other streams.¶
An endpoint that detects a stream error sends a RST_
A RST_
Normally, an endpoint SHOULD NOT send more than one RST_
To avoid looping, an endpoint MUST NOT send a RST_
5.4.3. Connection Termination
If the TCP connection is closed or reset while streams remain in the "open" or "half-closed" states, then the affected streams cannot be automatically retried (see Section 8.7 for details).¶
5.5. Extending HTTP/2
HTTP/2 permits extension of the protocol. Within the limitations described in this section, protocol extensions can be used to provide additional services or alter any aspect of the protocol. Extensions are effective only within the scope of a single HTTP/2 connection.¶
This applies to the protocol elements defined in this document. This does not affect the existing options for extending HTTP, such as defining new methods, status codes, or fields (see Section 16 of [HTTP]).¶
Extensions are permitted to use new frame types (Section 4.1), new settings (Section 6.5), or new error codes (Section 7). Registries for managing these extension points are defined in Section 11 of [RFC7540].¶
Implementations MUST ignore unknown or unsupported values in all extensible protocol
elements. Implementations MUST discard frames that have unknown or unsupported types.
This means that any of these extension points can be safely used by extensions without
prior arrangement or negotiation. However, extension frames that appear in the middle of
a field block (Section 4.3) are not permitted; these MUST be treated
as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
Extensions SHOULD avoid changing protocol elements defined in this document or elements for which no extension mechanism is defined. This includes changes to the layout of frames, additions or changes to the way that frames are composed into HTTP messages (Section 8.1), the definition of pseudo-header fields, or changes to any protocol element that a compliant endpoint might treat as a connection error (Section 5.4.1).¶
An extension that changes existing protocol elements or state MUST be negotiated before being used. For example, an extension that changes the layout of the HEADERS frame cannot be used until the peer has given a positive signal that this is acceptable. In this case, it could also be necessary to coordinate when the revised layout comes into effect. For example, treating frames other than DATA frames as flow controlled requires a change in semantics that both endpoints need to understand, so this can only be done through negotiation.¶
This document doesn't mandate a specific method for negotiating the use of an extension but notes that a setting (Section 6.5.2) could be used for that purpose. If both peers set a value that indicates willingness to use the extension, then the extension can be used. If a setting is used for extension negotiation, the initial value MUST be defined in such a fashion that the extension is initially disabled.¶
6. Frame Definitions
This specification defines a number of frame types, each identified by a unique 8-bit type code. Each frame type serves a distinct purpose in the establishment and management of either the connection as a whole or individual streams.¶
The transmission of specific frame types can alter the state of a connection. If endpoints fail to maintain a synchronized view of the connection state, successful communication within the connection will no longer be possible. Therefore, it is important that endpoints have a shared comprehension of how the state is affected by the use of any given frame.¶
6.1. DATA
DATA frames (type=0x00) convey arbitrary, variable-length sequences of octets associated with a stream. One or more DATA frames are used, for instance, to carry HTTP request or response message contents.¶
DATA frames MAY also contain padding. Padding can be added to DATA frames to obscure the size of messages. Padding is a security feature; see Section 10.7.¶
DATA Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x00,
Unused Flags (4),
PADDED Flag (1),
Unused Flags (2),
END_STREAM Flag (1),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
[Pad Length (8)],
Data (..),
Padding (..2040),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4. The DATA frame contains the following additional fields:¶
- Pad Length:
- An 8-bit field containing the length of the frame padding in units of octets. This field is conditional and is only present if the PADDED flag is set.¶
- Data:
- Application data. The amount of data is the remainder of the frame payload after subtracting the length of the other fields that are present.¶
- Padding:
- Padding octets that contain no application semantic value. Padding octets MUST be set
to zero when sending. A receiver is not obligated to verify padding but MAY treat
non-zero padding as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
ERROR .¶
The DATA frame defines the following flags:¶
- PADDED (0x08):
- When set, the PADDED flag indicates that the Pad Length field and any padding that it describes are present.¶
- END_
STREAM (0x01): - When set, the END_
STREAM flag indicates that this frame is the last that the endpoint will send for the identified stream. Setting this flag causes the stream to enter one of the "half-closed" states or the "closed" state (Section 5.1).¶
DATA frames MUST be associated with a stream. If a DATA frame is received whose Stream
Identifier field is 0x00, the recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
DATA frames are subject to flow control and can only be sent when a stream is in the
"open" or "half-closed (remote)" state. The entire DATA frame payload is included in flow
control, including the Pad Length and Padding fields if present. If a DATA frame is received
whose stream is not in the "open" or "half-closed (local)" state, the recipient MUST respond
with a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type
STREAM_
The total number of padding octets is determined by the value of the Pad Length field. If
the length of the padding is the length of the frame payload or greater, the recipient
MUST treat this as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
6.2. HEADERS
The HEADERS frame (type=0x01) is used to open a stream (Section 5.1), and additionally carries a field block fragment. Despite the name, a HEADERS frame can carry a header section or a trailer section. HEADERS frames can be sent on a stream in the "idle", "reserved (local)", "open", or "half-closed (remote)" state.¶
HEADERS Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x01,
Unused Flags (2),
PRIORITY Flag (1),
Unused Flag (1),
PADDED Flag (1),
END_HEADERS Flag (1),
Unused Flag (1),
END_STREAM Flag (1),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
[Pad Length (8)],
[Exclusive (1)],
[Stream Dependency (31)],
[Weight (8)],
Field Block Fragment (..),
Padding (..2040),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4. The HEADERS frame payload has the following additional fields:¶
- Pad Length:
- An 8-bit field containing the length of the frame padding in units of octets. This field is only present if the PADDED flag is set.¶
- Exclusive:
- A single-bit flag. This field is only present if the PRIORITY flag is set. Priority signals in HEADERS frames are deprecated; see Section 5.3.2.¶
- Stream Dependency:
- A 31-bit stream identifier. This field is only present if the PRIORITY flag is set.¶
- Weight:
- An unsigned 8-bit integer. This field is only present if the PRIORITY flag is set.¶
- Field Block Fragment:
- A field block fragment (Section 4.3).¶
- Padding:
- Padding octets that contain no application semantic value. Padding octets MUST be set
to zero when sending. A receiver is not obligated to verify padding but MAY treat
non-zero padding as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
ERROR .¶
The HEADERS frame defines the following flags:¶
- PRIORITY (0x20):
-
When set, the PRIORITY flag indicates that the Exclusive, Stream Dependency, and Weight fields are present.¶
- PADDED (0x08):
-
When set, the PADDED flag indicates that the Pad Length field and any padding that it describes are present.¶
- END_
HEADERS (0x04): -
When set, the END_
HEADERS flag indicates that this frame contains an entire field block (Section 4.3) and is not followed by any CONTINUATION frames.¶ A HEADERS frame without the END_
HEADERS flag set MUST be followed by a CONTINUATION frame for the same stream. A receiver MUST treat the receipt of any other type of frame or a frame on a different stream as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ ERROR .¶ - END_
STREAM (0x01): -
When set, the END_
STREAM flag indicates that the field block (Section 4.3) is the last that the endpoint will send for the identified stream.¶ A HEADERS frame with the END_
STREAM flag set signals the end of a stream. However, a HEADERS frame with the END_ STREAM flag set can be followed by CONTINUATION frames on the same stream. Logically, the CONTINUATION frames are part of the HEADERS frame.¶
The frame payload of a HEADERS frame contains a field block fragment (Section 4.3). A field block that does not fit within a HEADERS frame is continued in a CONTINUATION frame (Section 6.10).¶
HEADERS frames MUST be associated with a stream. If a HEADERS frame is received whose
Stream Identifier field is 0x00, the recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
The HEADERS frame changes the connection state as described in Section 4.3.¶
The total number of padding octets is determined by the value of the Pad Length field. If
the length of the padding is the length of the frame payload or greater, the recipient
MUST treat this as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
6.3. PRIORITY
The PRIORITY frame (type=0x02) is deprecated; see Section 5.3.2. A PRIORITY frame can be sent in any stream state, including idle or closed streams.¶
PRIORITY Frame {
Length (24) = 0x05,
Type (8) = 0x02,
Unused Flags (8),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
Exclusive (1),
Stream Dependency (31),
Weight (8),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4. The frame payload of a PRIORITY frame contains the following additional fields:¶
- Exclusive:
- A single-bit flag.¶
- Stream Dependency:
- A 31-bit stream identifier.¶
- Weight:
- An unsigned 8-bit integer.¶
The PRIORITY frame does not define any flags.¶
The PRIORITY frame always identifies a stream. If a PRIORITY frame is received with a
stream identifier of 0x00, the recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
Sending or receiving a PRIORITY frame does not affect the state of any stream (Section 5.1). The PRIORITY frame can be sent on a stream in any state, including "idle" or "closed". A PRIORITY frame cannot be sent between consecutive frames that comprise a single field block (Section 4.3).¶
A PRIORITY frame with a length other than 5 octets MUST be treated as a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type FRAME_
6.4. RST_STREAM
The RST_
RST_STREAM Frame {
Length (24) = 0x04,
Type (8) = 0x03,
Unused Flags (8),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
Error Code (32),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4.
Additionally, the RST_
The RST_
The RST_
RST_
RST_
A RST_
6.5. SETTINGS
The SETTINGS frame (type=0x04) conveys configuration parameters that affect how endpoints communicate, such as preferences and constraints on peer behavior. The SETTINGS frame is also used to acknowledge the receipt of those settings. Individually, a configuration parameter from a SETTINGS frame is referred to as a "setting".¶
Settings are not negotiated; they describe characteristics of the sending peer, which are used by the receiving peer. Different values for the same setting can be advertised by each peer. For example, a client might set a high initial flow-control window, whereas a server might set a lower value to conserve resources.¶
A SETTINGS frame MUST be sent by both endpoints at the start of a connection and MAY be sent at any other time by either endpoint over the lifetime of the connection. Implementations MUST support all of the settings defined by this specification.¶
Each parameter in a SETTINGS frame replaces any existing value for that parameter. Settings are processed in the order in which they appear, and a receiver of a SETTINGS frame does not need to maintain any state other than the current value of each setting. Therefore, the value of a SETTINGS parameter is the last value that is seen by a receiver.¶
SETTINGS frames are acknowledged by the receiving peer. To enable this, the SETTINGS frame defines the ACK flag:¶
- ACK (0x01):
- When set, the ACK flag indicates that this frame acknowledges receipt and application of the
peer's SETTINGS frame. When this bit is set, the frame payload of the SETTINGS frame MUST
be empty. Receipt of a SETTINGS frame with the ACK flag set and a length field value
other than 0 MUST be treated as a connection
error (Section 5.4.1) of type FRAME_
SIZE_ . For more information, see Section 6.5.3 ("Settings Synchronization").¶ERROR
SETTINGS frames always apply to a connection, never a single stream. The stream
identifier for a SETTINGS frame MUST be zero (0x00). If an endpoint receives a SETTINGS
frame whose Stream Identifier field is anything other than 0x00, the endpoint MUST respond
with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
The SETTINGS frame affects connection state. A badly formed or incomplete SETTINGS frame
MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
A SETTINGS frame with a length other than a multiple of 6 octets MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
FRAME_
6.5.1. SETTINGS Format
The frame payload of a SETTINGS frame consists of zero or more settings, each consisting of an unsigned 16-bit setting identifier and an unsigned 32-bit value.¶
SETTINGS Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x04,
Unused Flags (7),
ACK Flag (1),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31) = 0,
Setting (48) ...,
}
Setting {
Identifier (16),
Value (32),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4. The frame payload of a SETTINGS frame contains any number of Setting fields, each of which consists of:¶
- Identifier:
- A 16-bit setting identifier; see Section 6.5.2.¶
- Value:
- A 32-bit value for the setting.¶
6.5.2. Defined Settings
The following settings are defined:¶
-
SETTINGS_
HEADER_ TABLE_ SIZE (0x01): -
This setting allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint of the maximum size of the compression table used to decode field blocks, in units of octets. The encoder can select any size equal to or less than this value by using signaling specific to the compression format inside a field block (see [COMPRESSION]). The initial value is 4,096 octets.¶
-
SETTINGS_
ENABLE_ PUSH (0x02): -
This setting can be used to enable or disable server push. A server MUST NOT send a PUSH_
PROMISE frame if it receives this parameter set to a value of 0; see Section 8.4. A client that has both set this parameter to 0 and had it acknowledged MUST treat the receipt of a PUSH_PROMISE frame as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR .¶The initial value of SETTINGS_
ENABLE_ PUSH is 1. For a client, this value indicates that it is willing to receive PUSH_ PROMISE frames. For a server, this initial value has no effect, and is equivalent to the value 0. Any value other than 0 or 1 MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ ERROR .¶A server MUST NOT explicitly set this value to 1. A server MAY choose to omit this setting when it sends a SETTINGS frame, but if a server does include a value, it MUST be 0. A client MUST treat receipt of a SETTINGS frame with SETTINGS_
ENABLE_ PUSH set to 1 as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ ERROR .¶ -
SETTINGS_
MAX_ CONCURRENT_ STREAMS (0x03): -
This setting indicates the maximum number of concurrent streams that the sender will allow. This limit is directional: it applies to the number of streams that the sender permits the receiver to create. Initially, there is no limit to this value. It is recommended that this value be no smaller than 100, so as to not unnecessarily limit parallelism.¶
A value of 0 for SETTINGS_
MAX_ CONCURRENT_ STREAMS SHOULD NOT be treated as special by endpoints. A zero value does prevent the creation of new streams; however, this can also happen for any limit that is exhausted with active streams. Servers SHOULD only set a zero value for short durations; if a server does not wish to accept requests, closing the connection is more appropriate.¶ -
SETTINGS_
INITIAL_ WINDOW_ SIZE (0x04): -
This setting indicates the sender's initial window size (in units of octets) for stream-level flow control. The initial value is 216-1 (65,535) octets.¶
This setting affects the window size of all streams (see Section 6.9.2).¶
Values above the maximum flow-control window size of 231-1 MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type FLOW_
CONTROL_ .¶ERROR -
SETTINGS_
MAX_ FRAME_ SIZE (0x05): -
This setting indicates the size of the largest frame payload that the sender is willing to receive, in units of octets.¶
The initial value is 214 (16,384) octets. The value advertised by an endpoint MUST be between this initial value and the maximum allowed frame size (224-1 or 16,777,215 octets), inclusive. Values outside this range MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
ERROR .¶ -
SETTINGS_
MAX_ HEADER_ LIST_ SIZE (0x06): -
This advisory setting informs a peer of the maximum field section size that the sender is prepared to accept, in units of octets. The value is based on the uncompressed size of field lines, including the length of the name and value in units of octets plus an overhead of 32 octets for each field line.¶
For any given request, a lower limit than what is advertised MAY be enforced. The initial value of this setting is unlimited.¶
An endpoint that receives a SETTINGS frame with any unknown or unsupported identifier MUST ignore that setting.¶
6.5.3. Settings Synchronization
Most values in SETTINGS benefit from or require an understanding of when the peer has received and applied the changed parameter values. In order to provide such synchronization timepoints, the recipient of a SETTINGS frame in which the ACK flag is not set MUST apply the updated settings as soon as possible upon receipt. SETTINGS frames are acknowledged in the order in which they are received.¶
The values in the SETTINGS frame MUST be processed in the order they appear, with no other frame processing between values. Unsupported settings MUST be ignored. Once all values have been processed, the recipient MUST immediately emit a SETTINGS frame with the ACK flag set. Upon receiving a SETTINGS frame with the ACK flag set, the sender of the altered settings can rely on the values from the oldest unacknowledged SETTINGS frame having been applied.¶
If the sender of a SETTINGS frame does not receive an acknowledgment within a
reasonable amount of time, it MAY issue a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type SETTINGS_
6.6. PUSH_PROMISE
The PUSH_
PUSH_PROMISE Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x05,
Unused Flags (4),
PADDED Flag (1),
END_HEADERS Flag (1),
Unused Flags (2),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
[Pad Length (8)],
Reserved (1),
Promised Stream ID (31),
Field Block Fragment (..),
Padding (..2040),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4.
The PUSH_
- Pad Length:
- An 8-bit field containing the length of the frame padding in units of octets. This field is only present if the PADDED flag is set.¶
- Promised Stream ID:
- An unsigned 31-bit integer that identifies the stream that is reserved by the
PUSH_
PROMISE . The promised stream identifier MUST be a valid choice for the next stream sent by the sender (see "new stream identifier" in Section 5.1.1).¶ - Field Block Fragment:
- A field block fragment (Section 4.3) containing the request control data and a header section.¶
- Padding:
- Padding octets that contain no application semantic value. Padding octets MUST be set
to zero when sending. A receiver is not obligated to verify padding but MAY treat
non-zero padding as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
ERROR .¶
The PUSH_
- PADDED (0x08):
-
When set, the PADDED flag indicates that the Pad Length field and any padding that it describes are present.¶
- END_
HEADERS (0x04): -
When set, the END_
HEADERS flag indicates that this frame contains an entire field block (Section 4.3) and is not followed by any CONTINUATION frames.¶ A PUSH_
PROMISE frame without the END_ HEADERS flag set MUST be followed by a CONTINUATION frame for the same stream. A receiver MUST treat the receipt of any other type of frame or a frame on a different stream as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ ERROR .¶
PUSH_
Promised streams are not required to be used in the order they are promised. The
PUSH_
PUSH_
Recipients of PUSH_
A PUSH_
Since PUSH_
A receiver MUST treat the receipt of a PUSH_
The total number of padding octets is determined by the value of the Pad Length field. If
the length of the padding is the length of the frame payload or greater, the recipient
MUST treat this as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
type PROTOCOL_
6.7. PING
The PING frame (type=0x06) is a mechanism for measuring a minimal round-trip time from the sender, as well as determining whether an idle connection is still functional. PING frames can be sent from any endpoint.¶
PING Frame {
Length (24) = 0x08,
Type (8) = 0x06,
Unused Flags (7),
ACK Flag (1),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31) = 0,
Opaque Data (64),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4.¶
In addition to the frame header, PING frames MUST contain 8 octets of opaque data in the frame payload. A sender can include any value it chooses and use those octets in any fashion.¶
Receivers of a PING frame that does not include an ACK flag MUST send a PING frame with the ACK flag set in response, with an identical frame payload. PING responses SHOULD be given higher priority than any other frame.¶
The PING frame defines the following flags:¶
- ACK (0x01):
- When set, the ACK flag indicates that this PING frame is a PING response. An endpoint MUST set this flag in PING responses. An endpoint MUST NOT respond to PING frames containing this flag.¶
PING frames are not associated with any individual stream. If a PING frame is received
with a Stream Identifier field value other than 0x00, the recipient MUST respond with a
connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
Receipt of a PING frame with a length field value other than 8 MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
FRAME_
6.8. GOAWAY
The GOAWAY frame (type=0x07) is used to initiate shutdown of a connection or to signal serious error conditions. GOAWAY allows an endpoint to gracefully stop accepting new streams while still finishing processing of previously established streams. This enables administrative actions, like server maintenance.¶
There is an inherent race condition between an endpoint starting new streams and the
remote peer sending a GOAWAY frame. To deal with this case, the GOAWAY contains the stream
identifier of the last peer-initiated stream that was or might be processed on the
sending endpoint in this connection. For instance, if the server sends a GOAWAY frame,
the identified stream is the highest
Once the GOAWAY is sent, the sender will ignore frames sent on streams initiated by the receiver if the stream has an identifier higher than the included last stream identifier. Receivers of a GOAWAY frame MUST NOT open additional streams on the connection, although a new connection can be established for new streams.¶
If the receiver of the GOAWAY has sent data on streams with a higher stream identifier than what is indicated in the GOAWAY frame, those streams are not or will not be processed. The receiver of the GOAWAY frame can treat the streams as though they had never been created at all, thereby allowing those streams to be retried later on a new connection.¶
Endpoints SHOULD always send a GOAWAY frame before closing a connection so that the remote peer can know whether a stream has been partially processed or not. For example, if an HTTP client sends a POST at the same time that a server closes a connection, the client cannot know if the server started to process that POST request if the server does not send a GOAWAY frame to indicate what streams it might have acted on.¶
An endpoint might choose to close a connection without sending a GOAWAY for misbehaving peers.¶
A GOAWAY frame might not immediately precede closing of the connection; a receiver of a GOAWAY that has no more use for the connection SHOULD still send a GOAWAY frame before terminating the connection.¶
GOAWAY Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x07,
Unused Flags (8),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31) = 0,
Reserved (1),
Last-Stream-ID (31),
Error Code (32),
Additional Debug Data (..),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4.¶
The GOAWAY frame does not define any flags.¶
The GOAWAY frame applies to the connection, not a specific stream. An endpoint MUST treat
a GOAWAY frame with a stream identifier other than 0x00 as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
PROTOCOL_
The last stream identifier in the GOAWAY frame contains the highest
If a connection terminates without a GOAWAY frame, the last stream identifier is effectively the highest possible stream identifier.¶
On streams with lower- or equal-numbered identifiers that were not closed completely prior to the connection being closed, reattempting requests, transactions, or any protocol activity is not possible, except for idempotent actions like HTTP GET, PUT, or DELETE. Any protocol activity that uses higher-numbered streams can be safely retried using a new connection.¶
Activity on streams numbered lower than or equal to the last stream identifier might still complete successfully. The sender of a GOAWAY frame might gracefully shut down a connection by sending a GOAWAY frame, maintaining the connection in an "open" state until all in-progress streams complete.¶
An endpoint MAY send multiple GOAWAY frames if circumstances change. For instance, an
endpoint that sends GOAWAY with NO_
A client that is unable to retry requests loses all requests that are in flight when the
server closes the connection. This is especially true for intermediaries that might not
be serving clients using HTTP/2. A server that is attempting to gracefully shut down a
connection SHOULD send an initial GOAWAY frame with the last stream identifier set to
231-1 and a NO_
After sending a GOAWAY frame, the sender can discard frames for streams initiated by the
receiver with identifiers higher than the identified last stream. However, any frames
that alter connection state cannot be completely ignored. For instance,
HEADERS, PUSH_
The GOAWAY frame also contains a 32-bit error code (Section 7) that contains the reason for closing the connection.¶
Endpoints MAY append opaque data to the frame payload of any GOAWAY frame. Additional debug
data is intended for diagnostic purposes only and carries no semantic value. Debug
information could contain security- or privacy
6.9. WINDOW_UPDATE
The WINDOW_
Flow control operates at two levels: on each individual stream and on the entire connection.¶
Both types of flow control are hop by hop, that is, only between the two endpoints.
Intermediaries do not forward WINDOW_
Flow control only applies to frames that are identified as being subject to flow control.
Of the frame types defined in this document, this includes only DATA frames.
Frames that are exempt from flow control MUST be accepted and processed, unless the
receiver is unable to assign resources to handling the frame. A receiver MAY respond with
a stream error (Section 5.4.2) or connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
FLOW_
WINDOW_UPDATE Frame {
Length (24) = 0x04,
Type (8) = 0x08,
Unused Flags (8),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
Reserved (1),
Window Size Increment (31),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4.
The frame payload of a WINDOW_
The WINDOW_
The WINDOW_
A receiver MUST treat the receipt of a WINDOW_
WINDOW_
A receiver that receives a flow-controlled frame MUST always account for its contribution against the connection flow-control window, unless the receiver treats this as a connection error (Section 5.4.1). This is necessary even if the frame is in error. The sender counts the frame toward the flow-control window, but if the receiver does not, the flow-control window at the sender and receiver can become different.¶
A WINDOW_
6.9.1. The Flow-Control Window
Flow control in HTTP/2 is implemented using a window kept by each sender on every stream. The flow-control window is a simple integer value that indicates how many octets of data the sender is permitted to transmit; as such, its size is a measure of the buffering capacity of the receiver.¶
Two flow-control windows are applicable: the stream flow-control window and the
connection flow-control window. The sender MUST NOT send a flow-controlled frame with a
length that exceeds the space available in either of the flow-control windows advertised
by the receiver. Frames with zero length with the END_
For flow-control calculations, the 9-octet frame header is not counted.¶
After sending a flow-controlled frame, the sender reduces the space available in both windows by the length of the transmitted frame.¶
The receiver of a frame sends a WINDOW_
A sender that receives a WINDOW_
A sender MUST NOT allow a flow-control window to exceed 231-1 octets.
If a sender receives a WINDOW_
Flow-controlled frames from the sender and WINDOW_
6.9.2. Initial Flow-Control Window Size
When an HTTP/2 connection is first established, new streams are created with an initial
flow-control window size of 65,535 octets. The connection flow-control window is also 65,535
octets. Both endpoints can adjust the initial window size for new streams by including
a value for SETTINGS_
Prior to receiving a SETTINGS frame that sets a value for
SETTINGS_
In addition to changing the flow-control window for streams that are not yet active, a
SETTINGS frame can alter the initial flow-control window size for streams
with active flow-control windows (that is, streams in the "open" or "half-closed
(remote)" state). When the value of SETTINGS_
A change to SETTINGS_
For example, if the client sends 60 KB immediately on connection establishment and the
server sets the initial window size to be 16 KB, the client will recalculate the
available flow-control window to be -44 KB on receipt of the SETTINGS
frame. The client retains a negative flow-control window until WINDOW_
A SETTINGS frame cannot alter the connection flow-control window.¶
An endpoint MUST treat a change to SETTINGS_
6.9.3. Reducing the Stream Window Size
A receiver that wishes to use a smaller flow-control window than the current size can send a new SETTINGS frame. However, the receiver MUST be prepared to receive data that exceeds this window size, since the sender might send data that exceeds the lower limit prior to processing the SETTINGS frame.¶
After sending a SETTINGS frame that reduces the initial flow-control window size, a
receiver MAY continue to process streams that exceed flow-control limits. Allowing
streams to continue does not allow the receiver to immediately reduce the space it
reserves for flow-control windows. Progress on these streams can also stall, since
WINDOW_
6.10. CONTINUATION
The CONTINUATION frame (type=0x09) is used to continue a sequence of field block fragments (Section 4.3). Any number of CONTINUATION frames can
be sent, as long as the preceding frame is on the same stream and is a
HEADERS, PUSH_
CONTINUATION Frame {
Length (24),
Type (8) = 0x09,
Unused Flags (5),
END_HEADERS Flag (1),
Unused Flags (2),
Reserved (1),
Stream Identifier (31),
Field Block Fragment (..),
}
The Length, Type, Unused Flag(s), Reserved, and Stream Identifier fields are described in Section 4. The CONTINUATION frame payload contains a field block fragment (Section 4.3).¶
The CONTINUATION frame defines the following flag:¶
- END_
HEADERS (0x04): -
When set, the END_
HEADERS flag indicates that this frame ends a field block (Section 4.3).¶ If the END_
HEADERS flag is not set, this frame MUST be followed by another CONTINUATION frame. A receiver MUST treat the receipt of any other type of frame or a frame on a different stream as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ ERROR .¶
The CONTINUATION frame changes the connection state as defined in Section 4.3.¶
CONTINUATION frames MUST be associated with a stream. If a CONTINUATION frame is received
with a Stream Identifier field of 0x00, the recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_
A CONTINUATION frame MUST be preceded by a HEADERS,
PUSH_
7. Error Codes
Error codes are 32-bit fields that are used in RST_
Error codes share a common code space. Some error codes apply only to either streams or the entire connection and have no defined semantics in the other context.¶
The following error codes are defined:¶
- NO_
ERROR (0x00): - PROTOCOL_
ERROR (0x01): -
The endpoint detected an unspecific protocol error. This error is for use when a more specific error code is not available.¶
- INTERNAL_
ERROR (0x02): -
The endpoint encountered an unexpected internal error.¶
- FLOW_
CONTROL_ ERROR (0x03): -
The endpoint detected that its peer violated the flow-control protocol.¶
- SETTINGS_
TIMEOUT (0x04): -
The endpoint sent a SETTINGS frame but did not receive a response in a timely manner. See Section 6.5.3 ("Settings Synchronization
" ).¶ - STREAM_
CLOSED (0x05): -
The endpoint received a frame after a stream was half-closed.¶
- FRAME_
SIZE_ ERROR (0x06): -
The endpoint received a frame with an invalid size.¶
- REFUSED_
STREAM (0x07): -
The endpoint refused the stream prior to performing any application processing (see Section 8.7 for details).¶
- CANCEL (0x08):
-
The endpoint uses this error code to indicate that the stream is no longer needed.¶
- COMPRESSION_
ERROR (0x09): -
The endpoint is unable to maintain the field section compression context for the connection.¶
- CONNECT_
ERROR (0x0a): -
The connection established in response to a CONNECT request (Section 8.5) was reset or abnormally closed.¶
- ENHANCE_
YOUR_ CALM (0x0b): -
The endpoint detected that its peer is exhibiting a behavior that might be generating excessive load.¶
- INADEQUATE_
SECURITY (0x0c): -
The underlying transport has properties that do not meet minimum security requirements (see Section 9.2).¶
- HTTP_
1_ 1_ REQUIRED (0x0d): -
The endpoint requires that HTTP/1.1 be used instead of HTTP/2.¶
Unknown or unsupported error codes MUST NOT trigger any special behavior. These MAY be
treated by an implementation as being equivalent to INTERNAL_
8. Expressing HTTP Semantics in HTTP/2
HTTP/2 is an instantiation of the HTTP message abstraction (Section 6 of [HTTP]).¶
8.1. HTTP Message Framing
A client sends an HTTP request on a new stream, using a previously unused stream identifier (Section 5.1.1). A server sends an HTTP response on the same stream as the request.¶
An HTTP message (request or response) consists of:¶
- one HEADERS frame (followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames) containing the header section (see Section 6.3 of [HTTP]),¶
- zero or more DATA frames containing the message content (see Section 6.4 of [HTTP]), and¶
- optionally, one HEADERS frame (followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames) containing the trailer section, if present (see Section 6.5 of [HTTP]).¶
For a response only, a server MAY send any number of interim responses before the HEADERS frame containing a final response. An
interim response consists of a HEADERS frame
(which might be followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames) containing the control data and header section
of an interim (1xx) HTTP response (see Section 15 of [HTTP]). A HEADERS frame with the END_
The last frame in the sequence bears an END_
Other frames (from any stream) MUST NOT occur between the HEADERS frame and any CONTINUATION frames that might follow.¶
HTTP/2 uses DATA frames to carry message content. The chunked transfer encoding
defined in Section 7.1 of [HTTP/1.1] cannot be used in HTTP/2; see Section 8.2.2.¶
Trailer fields are carried in a field block that also terminates the stream. That is,
trailer fields comprise a sequence starting with a HEADERS frame, followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames, where the HEADERS frame bears an END_
An endpoint that receives a HEADERS frame
without the END_
An HTTP request
An HTTP response is complete after the server sends -- or the client receives -- a frame
with the END_
8.1.1. Malformed Messages
A malformed request or response is one that is an otherwise valid sequence of HTTP/2 frames but is invalid due to the presence of extraneous frames, prohibited fields or pseudo-header fields, the absence of mandatory pseudo-header fields, the inclusion of uppercase field names, or invalid field names and/or values (in certain circumstances; see Section 8.2).¶
A request or response that includes message content can include a
content-length header field. A request or response is also malformed if the
value of a content-length header field does not equal the sum of the DATA frame payload lengths that form the content,
unless the message is defined as having no content. For example, 204 or 304 responses
contain no content, as does the response to a HEAD request. A response that is defined
to have no content, as described in Section 6.4.1 of [HTTP], MAY have a
non-zero content-length header field, even though no content is included in
DATA frames.¶
Intermediaries that process HTTP requests or responses (i.e., any intermediary not
acting as a tunnel) MUST NOT forward a malformed request or response. Malformed
requests or responses that are detected MUST be treated as a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type PROTOCOL_
For malformed requests, a server MAY send an HTTP response prior to closing or resetting the stream. Clients MUST NOT accept a malformed response.¶
Endpoints that progressively process messages might have performed some processing before identifying a request or response as malformed. For instance, it might be possible to generate an informational or 404 status code without having received a complete request. Similarly, intermediaries might forward incomplete messages before detecting errors. A server MAY generate a final response before receiving an entire request when the response does not depend on the remainder of the request being correct.¶
These requirements are intended to protect against several types of common attacks
against HTTP; they are deliberately strict because being permissive can expose
implementations to these vulnerabilities
8.2. HTTP Fields
HTTP fields (Section 5 of [HTTP]) are conveyed by HTTP/2 in the HEADERS,
CONTINUATION, and PUSH_
Field names MUST be converted to lowercase when constructing an HTTP/2 message.¶
8.2.1. Field Validity
The definitions of field names and values in HTTP prohibit some characters that HPACK might be able to convey. HTTP/2 implementations SHOULD validate field names and values according to their definitions in Sections 5.1 and 5.5 of [HTTP], respectively, and treat messages that contain prohibited characters as malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
Failure to validate fields can be exploited for request smuggling attacks. In particular, unvalidated fields might enable attacks when messages are forwarded using HTTP/1.1 [HTTP/1.1], where characters such as carriage return (CR), line feed (LF), and COLON are used as delimiters. Implementations MUST perform the following minimal validation of field names and values:¶
- A field name MUST NOT contain characters in the ranges 0x00-0x20, 0x41-0x5a, or 0x7f-0xff (all ranges inclusive). This specifically excludes all non-visible ASCII characters, ASCII SP (0x20), and uppercase characters ('A' to 'Z', ASCII 0x41 to 0x5a).¶
- With the exception of pseudo-header fields (Section 8.3), which have a name that starts with a single colon, field names MUST NOT include a colon (ASCII COLON, 0x3a).¶
- A field value MUST NOT contain the zero value (ASCII NUL, 0x00), line feed (ASCII LF, 0x0a), or carriage return (ASCII CR, 0x0d) at any position.¶
- A field value MUST NOT start or end with an ASCII whitespace character (ASCII SP or HTAB, 0x20 or 0x09).¶
A request or response that contains a field that violates any of these conditions MUST be treated as malformed (Section 8.1.1). In particular, an intermediary that does not process fields when forwarding messages MUST NOT forward fields that contain any of the values that are listed as prohibited above.¶
When a request message violates one of these requirements, an implementation SHOULD generate a 400 (Bad Request) status code (see Section 15.5.1 of [HTTP]), unless a more suitable status code is defined or the status code cannot be sent (e.g., because the error occurs in a trailer field).¶
8.2.2. Connection-Specific Header Fields
HTTP/2 does not use the Connection header field (Section 7.6.1 of [HTTP]) to indicate connectionConnection header field and those listed as having connectionProxy-Connection,
Keep-Alive, Transfer, and Upgrade). Any message
containing connection
The only exception to this is the TE header field, which MAY be present in an HTTP/2 request; when it is, it MUST NOT contain any value other than "trailers".¶
An intermediary transforming an HTTP/1.x message to HTTP/2 MUST remove connection
8.2.3. Compressing the Cookie Header Field
The Cookie header field [COOKIE] uses a semicolon (";") to delimit cookie-pairs (or "crumbs"). This header field contains multiple values, but does not use a COMMA (",") as a separator, thereby preventing cookie-pairs from being sent on multiple field lines (see Section 5.2 of [HTTP]). This can significantly reduce compression efficiency, as updates to individual cookie-pairs would invalidate any field lines that are stored in the HPACK table.¶
To allow for better compression efficiency, the Cookie header field MAY be split into separate header fields, each with one or more cookie-pairs. If there are multiple Cookie header fields after decompression, these MUST be concatenated into a single octet string using the two-octet delimiter of 0x3b, 0x20 (the ASCII string "; ") before being passed into a non-HTTP/2 context, such as an HTTP/1.1 connection, or a generic HTTP server application.¶
Therefore, the following two lists of Cookie header fields are semantically equivalent.¶
cookie: a=b; c=d; e=f cookie: a=b cookie: c=d cookie: e=f
8.3. HTTP Control Data
HTTP/2 uses special pseudo-header fields beginning with a ':' character (ASCII 0x3a) to convey message control data (see Section 6.2 of [HTTP]).¶
Pseudo-header fields are not HTTP header fields. Endpoints MUST NOT generate pseudo-header fields other than those defined in this document. Note that an extension could negotiate the use of additional pseudo-header fields; see Section 5.5.¶
Pseudo-header fields are only valid in the context in which they are defined. Pseudo-header fields defined for requests MUST NOT appear in responses; pseudo-header fields defined for responses MUST NOT appear in requests. Pseudo-header fields MUST NOT appear in a trailer section. Endpoints MUST treat a request or response that contains undefined or invalid pseudo-header fields as malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
All pseudo-header fields MUST appear in a field block before all regular field lines. Any request or response that contains a pseudo-header field that appears in a field block after a regular field line MUST be treated as malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
The same pseudo-header field name MUST NOT appear more than once in a field block. A field block for an HTTP request or response that contains a repeated pseudo-header field name MUST be treated as malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
8.3.1. Request Pseudo-Header Fields
The following pseudo-header fields are defined for HTTP/2 requests:¶
-
The "
:method" pseudo-header field includes the HTTP method (Section 9 of [HTTP]).¶ -
The "
:scheme" pseudo-header field includes the scheme portion of the request target. The scheme is taken from the target URI (Section 3.1 of [RFC3986]) when generating a request directly, or from the scheme of a translated request (for example, see Section 3.3 of [HTTP/1.1]). Scheme is omitted for CONNECT requests (Section 8.5).¶"
:scheme" is not restricted to "http" and "https" schemed URIs. A proxy or gateway can translate requests for non-HTTP schemes, enabling the use of HTTP to interact with non-HTTP services.¶ -
The "
:authority" pseudo-header field conveys the authority portion (Section 3.2 of [RFC3986]) of the target URI (Section 7.1 of [HTTP]). The recipient of an HTTP/2 request MUST NOT use theHostheader field to determine the target URI if ":authority" is present.¶Clients that generate HTTP/2 requests directly MUST use the "
:authority" pseudo-header field to convey authority information, unless there is no authority information to convey (in which case it MUST NOT generate ":authority").¶Clients MUST NOT generate a request with a
Hostheader field that differs from the ":authority" pseudo-header field. A server SHOULD treat a request as malformed if it contains aHostheader field that identifies an entity that differs from the entity in the ":authority" pseudo-header field. The values of fields need to be normalized to compare them (see Section 6.2 of [RFC3986]). An origin server can apply any normalization method, whereas other servers MUST perform scheme-based normalization (see Section 6.2.3 of [RFC3986]) of the two fields.¶An intermediary that forwards a request over HTTP/2 MUST construct an "
:authority" pseudo-header field using the authority information from the control data of the original request, unless the original request's target URI does not contain authority information (in which case it MUST NOT generate ":authority"). Note that theHostheader field is not the sole source of this information; see Section 7.2 of [HTTP].¶An intermediary that needs to generate a
Hostheader field (which might be necessary to construct an HTTP/1.1 request) MUST use the value from the ":authority" pseudo-header field as the value of theHostfield, unless the intermediary also changes the request target. This replaces any existingHostfield to avoid potential vulnerabilities in HTTP routing.¶An intermediary that forwards a request over HTTP/2 MAY retain any
Hostheader field.¶Note that request targets for CONNECT or asterisk-form OPTIONS requests never include authority information; see Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of [HTTP].¶
"
:authority" MUST NOT include the deprecated userinfo subcomponent for "http" or "https" schemed URIs.¶ -
The "
:path" pseudo-header field includes the path and query parts of the target URI (theabsolute-pathproduction and, optionally, a '?' character followed by thequeryproduction; see Section 4.1 of [HTTP]). A request in asterisk form (for OPTIONS) includes the value '*' for the ":path" pseudo-header field.¶This pseudo-header field MUST NOT be empty for "
http" or "https" URIs; "http" or "https" URIs that do not contain a path component MUST include a value of '/'. The exceptions to this rule are:¶- an OPTIONS request for an "
http" or "https" URI that does not include a path component; these MUST include a ":path" pseudo-header field with a value of '*' (see Section 7.1 of [HTTP]).¶ -
CONNECT requests (Section 8.5), where the "
:path" pseudo-header field is omitted.¶
- an OPTIONS request for an "
All HTTP/2 requests MUST include exactly one valid value for the ":method",
":scheme", and ":path" pseudo-header fields, unless they are CONNECT requests (Section 8.5). An HTTP request that omits mandatory
pseudo-header fields is malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
Individual HTTP/2 requests do not carry an explicit indicator of protocol version. All HTTP/2 requests implicitly have a protocol version of "2.0" (see Section 6.2 of [HTTP]).¶
8.3.2. Response Pseudo-Header Fields
For HTTP/2 responses, a single ":status" pseudo-header
field is defined that carries the HTTP status code field (see
Section 15 of [HTTP]). This pseudo-header field MUST be included in all
responses, including interim responses; otherwise, the response is
malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
HTTP/2 responses implicitly have a protocol version of "2.0".¶
8.4. Server Push
HTTP/2 allows a server to preemptively send (or "push") responses (along with
corresponding "promised" requests) to a client in association with a previous
client
Server push was designed to allow a server to improve client
In practice, server push is difficult to use effectively, because it requires the server to correctly anticipate the additional requests the client will make, taking into account factors such as caching, content negotiation, and user behavior. Errors in prediction can lead to performance degradation, due to the opportunity cost that the additional data on the wire represents. In particular, pushing any significant amount of data can cause contention issues with responses that are more important.¶
A client can request that server push be disabled, though this is negotiated for each hop
independently. The SETTINGS_
Promised requests MUST be safe (see Section 9.2.1 of [HTTP]) and cacheable
(see Section 9.2.3 of [HTTP]). Promised requests cannot include any content
or a trailer section. Clients that receive a promised request that is not cacheable, that
is not known to be safe, or that indicates the presence of request content MUST reset the
promised stream with a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type
PROTOCOL_
Pushed responses that are cacheable (see Section 3 of [CACHING]) can be stored by the client, if it implements an HTTP cache. Pushed responses are considered successfully validated on the origin server (e.g., if the "no-cache" cache response directive is present; see Section 5.2.2.4 of [CACHING]) while the stream identified by the promised stream identifier is still open.¶
Pushed responses that are not cacheable MUST NOT be stored by any HTTP cache. They MAY be made available to the application separately.¶
The server MUST include a value in the ":authority" pseudo-header field for which
the server is authoritative (see Section 10.1). A client MUST treat a PUSH_
An intermediary can receive pushes from the server and choose not to forward them on to the client. In other words, how to make use of the pushed information is up to that intermediary. Equally, the intermediary might choose to make additional pushes to the client, without any action taken by the server.¶
A client cannot push. Thus, servers MUST treat the receipt of a PUSH_
8.4.1. Push Requests
Server push is semantically equivalent to a server responding to a request; however, in
this case, that request is also sent by the server, as a PUSH_
The PUSH_
Promised requests are always associated with an explicit request from the client. The
PUSH_
The header fields in PUSH_:method" pseudo-header
field that is safe and cacheable. If a client receives a PUSH_:method" pseudo-header field identifies a method that is
not safe, it MUST respond on the promised stream with a stream error (Section 5.4.2) of type PROTOCOL_
The server SHOULD send PUSH_
For example, if the server receives a request for a document containing embedded links
to multiple image files and the server chooses to push those additional images to the
client, sending PUSH_
PUSH_
PUSH_
Sending a PUSH_
8.4.2. Push Responses
After sending the PUSH_
Once a client receives a PUSH_
If the client determines, for any reason, that it does not wish to receive the pushed
response from the server or if the server takes too long to begin sending the promised
response, the client can send a RST_
A client can use the SETTINGS_
Clients receiving a pushed response MUST validate that either the server is
authoritative (see Section 10.1) or the proxy that provided the pushed
response is configured for the corresponding request. For example, a server that offers
a certificate for only the example.com DNS-ID (see [RFC6125])
is not permitted to push a response for <https://>.¶
The response for a PUSH_
8.5. The CONNECT Method
The CONNECT method (Section 9.3.6 of [HTTP]) is
used to convert an HTTP connection into a tunnel to a remote host.
CONNECT is primarily used with HTTP proxies to establish a TLS session with an origin
server for the purposes of interacting with "https" resources.¶
In HTTP/2, the CONNECT method establishes a tunnel over a single HTTP/2 stream to a remote host, rather than converting the entire connection to a tunnel. A CONNECT header section is constructed as defined in Section 8.3.1 ("Request Pseudo-Header Fields"), with a few differences. Specifically:¶
- The "
:method" pseudo-header field is set toCONNECT.¶ - The "
:scheme" and ":path" pseudo-header fields MUST be omitted.¶ - The "
:authority" pseudo-header field contains the host and port to connect to (equivalent to the authority-form of the request-target of CONNECT requests; see Section 3.2.3 of [HTTP/1.1]).¶
A CONNECT request that does not conform to these restrictions is malformed (Section 8.1.1).¶
A proxy that supports CONNECT establishes a TCP connection [TCP] to
the host and port identified in the ":authority" pseudo-header field. Once
this connection is successfully established, the proxy sends a HEADERS
frame containing a 2xx-series status code to the client, as defined in Section 9.3.6 of [HTTP].¶
After the initial HEADERS frame sent by each
peer, all subsequent DATA frames correspond to
data sent on the TCP connection. The frame payload of any DATA frames sent by the client is transmitted by the proxy to the
TCP server; data received from the TCP server is assembled into DATA frames by the proxy. Frame types other than DATA or stream management frames (RST_
The TCP connection can be closed by either peer. The END_
A TCP connection error is signaled with RST_
8.6. The Upgrade Header Field
HTTP/2 does not support the 101 (Switching Protocols) informational status code (Section 15.2.2 of [HTTP]).¶
The semantics of 101 (Switching Protocols) aren't applicable to a multiplexed protocol. Similar functionality might be enabled through the use of extended CONNECT [RFC8441], and other protocols are able to use the same mechanisms that HTTP/2 uses to negotiate their use (see Section 3).¶
8.7. Request Reliability
In general, an HTTP client is unable to retry a non-idempotent request when an error occurs because there is no means to determine the nature of the error (see Section 9.2.2 of [HTTP]). It is possible that some server processing occurred prior to the error, which could result in undesirable effects if the request were reattempted.¶
HTTP/2 provides two mechanisms for providing a guarantee to a client that a request has not been processed:¶
- The GOAWAY frame indicates the highest stream number that might have been processed. Requests on streams with higher numbers are therefore guaranteed to be safe to retry.¶
- The REFUSED_
STREAM error code can be included in a RST_STREAM frame to indicate that the stream is being closed prior to any processing having occurred. Any request that was sent on the reset stream can be safely retried.¶
Requests that have not been processed have not failed; clients MAY automatically retry them, even those with non-idempotent methods.¶
A server MUST NOT indicate that a stream has not been processed unless it can guarantee
that fact. If frames that are on a stream are passed to the application layer for any
stream, then REFUSED_
In addition to these mechanisms, the PING frame provides a way for a client to easily test a connection. Connections that remain idle can become broken, because some middleboxes (for instance, network address translators or load balancers) silently discard connection bindings. The PING frame allows a client to safely test whether a connection is still active without sending a request.¶
8.8. Examples
This section shows HTTP/1.1 requests and responses, with illustrations of equivalent HTTP/2 requests and responses.¶
8.8.1. Simple Request
An HTTP GET request includes control data and a request header with no message content and is therefore
transmitted as a single HEADERS frame, followed by zero or more
CONTINUATION frames containing the serialized block of request header
fields. The HEADERS frame in the following has both the END_
GET /resource HTTP/1.1 HEADERS
Host: example.org ==> + END_STREAM
Accept: image/jpeg + END_HEADERS
:method = GET
:scheme = https
:authority = example.org
:path = /resource
host = example.org
accept = image/jpeg
8.8.2. Simple Response
Similarly, a response that includes only control data and a response header is transmitted as a HEADERS frame (again, followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames) containing the serialized block of response header fields.¶
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified HEADERS
ETag: "xyzzy" ==> + END_STREAM
Expires: Thu, 23 Jan ... + END_HEADERS
:status = 304
etag = "xyzzy"
expires = Thu, 23 Jan ...
8.8.3. Complex Request
An HTTP POST request that includes control data and a request header with message content is transmitted
as one HEADERS frame, followed by zero or more
CONTINUATION frames containing the request header, followed by one
or more DATA frames, with the last CONTINUATION (or
HEADERS) frame having the END_
POST /resource HTTP/1.1 HEADERS
Host: example.org ==> - END_STREAM
Content-Type: image/jpeg - END_HEADERS
Content-Length: 123 :method = POST
:authority = example.org
:path = /resource
{binary data} :scheme = https
CONTINUATION
+ END_HEADERS
content-type = image/jpeg
host = example.org
content-length = 123
DATA
+ END_STREAM
{binary data}
Note that data contributing to any given field line could be spread between field block fragments. The allocation of field lines to frames in this example is illustrative only.¶
8.8.4. Response with Body
A response that includes control data and a response header with message content is
transmitted as a HEADERS frame, followed by
zero or more CONTINUATION frames,
followed by one or more DATA frames, with the
last DATA frame in the sequence having the
END_
HTTP/1.1 200 OK HEADERS
Content-Type: image/jpeg ==> - END_STREAM
Content-Length: 123 + END_HEADERS
:status = 200
{binary data} content-type = image/jpeg
content-length = 123
DATA
+ END_STREAM
{binary data}
8.8.5. Informational Responses
An informational response using a 1xx status code other than 101 is transmitted as a HEADERS frame, followed by zero or more CONTINUATION frames.¶
A trailer section is sent as a field block after both the request or response
field block and all the DATA frames have been sent. The
HEADERS frame starting the field block that comprises
the trailer section has the END_
The following example includes both a 100 (Continue) status code, which is sent in response to a request containing a "100-continue" token in the Expect header field, and a trailer section:¶
HTTP/1.1 100 Continue HEADERS
Extension-Field: bar ==> - END_STREAM
+ END_HEADERS
:status = 100
extension-field = bar
HTTP/1.1 200 OK HEADERS
Content-Type: image/jpeg ==> - END_STREAM
Transfer-Encoding: chunked + END_HEADERS
Trailer: Foo :status = 200
content-type = image/jpeg
123 trailer = Foo
{binary data}
0 DATA
Foo: bar - END_STREAM
{binary data}
HEADERS
+ END_STREAM
+ END_HEADERS
foo = bar
9. HTTP/2 Connections
This section outlines attributes of HTTP that improve interoperabilit
9.1. Connection Management
HTTP/2 connections are persistent. For best performance, it is expected that clients will not close connections until it is determined that no further communication with a server is necessary (for example, when a user navigates away from a particular web page) or until the server closes the connection.¶
Clients SHOULD NOT open more than one HTTP/2 connection to a given host and port pair, where the host is derived from a URI, a selected alternative service [ALT-SVC], or a configured proxy.¶
A client can create additional connections as replacements, either to replace connections that are near to exhausting the available stream identifier space (Section 5.1.1), to refresh the keying material for a TLS connection, or to replace connections that have encountered errors (Section 5.4.1).¶
A client MAY open multiple connections to the same IP address and TCP port using different Server Name Indication [TLS-EXT] values or to provide different TLS client certificates but SHOULD avoid creating multiple connections with the same configuration.¶
Servers are encouraged to maintain open connections for as long as possible but are permitted to terminate idle connections if necessary. When either endpoint chooses to close the transport-layer TCP connection, the terminating endpoint SHOULD first send a GOAWAY (Section 6.8) frame so that both endpoints can reliably determine whether previously sent frames have been processed and gracefully complete or terminate any necessary remaining tasks.¶
9.1.1. Connection Reuse
Connections that are made to an origin server, either directly or through a tunnel created using the CONNECT method (Section 8.5), MAY be reused for requests with multiple different URI authority components. A connection can be reused as long as the origin server is authoritative (Section 10.1). For TCP connections without TLS, this depends on the host having resolved to the same IP address.¶
For "https" resources, connection reuse additionally depends
on having a certificate that is valid for the host in the URI. The certificate
presented by the server MUST satisfy any checks that the client would perform when
forming a new TLS connection for the host in the URI. A single certificate can be
used to establish authority for multiple origins. Section 4.3 of [HTTP]
describes how a client determines whether a server is authoritative for a URI.¶
In some deployments, reusing a connection for multiple origins can result in requests being directed to the wrong origin server. For example, TLS termination might be performed by a middlebox that uses the TLS Server Name Indication [TLS-EXT] extension to select an origin server. This means that it is possible for clients to send requests to servers that might not be the intended target for the request, even though the server is otherwise authoritative.¶
A server that does not wish clients to reuse connections can indicate that it is not authoritative for a request by sending a 421 (Misdirected Request) status code in response to the request (see Section 15.5.20 of [HTTP]).¶
A client that is configured to use a proxy over HTTP/2 directs requests to that proxy through a single connection. That is, all requests sent via a proxy reuse the connection to the proxy.¶
9.2. Use of TLS Features
Implementations of HTTP/2 MUST use TLS version 1.2 [TLS12] or higher for HTTP/2 over TLS. The general TLS usage guidance in [TLSBCP] SHOULD be followed, with some additional restrictions that are specific to HTTP/2.¶
The TLS implementation MUST support the Server Name Indication
(SNI) [TLS-EXT] extension to TLS. If the server is identified by a domain name [DNS-TERMS], clients MUST send the server_
Requirements for deployments of HTTP/2 that negotiate TLS 1.3 [TLS13] are included in Section 9.2.3. Deployments of TLS 1.2 are subject to the requirements in Sections 9.2.1 and 9.2.2. Implementations are encouraged to provide defaults that comply, but it is recognized that deployments are ultimately responsible for compliance.¶
9.2.1. TLS 1.2 Features
This section describes restrictions on the TLS 1.2 feature set that can be used with
HTTP/2. Due to deployment limitations, it might not be possible to fail TLS negotiation
when these restrictions are not met. An endpoint MAY immediately terminate an HTTP/2
connection that does not meet these TLS requirements with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type INADEQUATE_
A deployment of HTTP/2 over TLS 1.2 MUST disable compression. TLS compression can lead to the exposure of information that would not otherwise be revealed [RFC3749]. Generic compression is unnecessary, since HTTP/2 provides compression features that are more aware of context and therefore likely to be more appropriate for use for performance, security, or other reasons.¶
A deployment of HTTP/2 over TLS 1.2 MUST disable renegotiation. An endpoint MUST treat
a TLS renegotiation as a connection error (Section 5.4.1)
of type PROTOCOL_
An endpoint MAY use renegotiation to provide confidentiality protection for client credentials offered in the handshake, but any renegotiation MUST occur prior to sending the connection preface. A server SHOULD request a client certificate if it sees a renegotiation request immediately after establishing a connection.¶
This effectively prevents the use of renegotiation in response to a request for a
specific protected resource. A future specification might provide a way to support this
use case. Alternatively, a server might use an error (Section 5.4) of type HTTP_
Implementations MUST support ephemeral key exchange sizes of at least 2048 bits for
cipher suites that use ephemeral finite field Diffie-Hellman (DHE) (Section 8.1.2 of [TLS12]) and 224 bits for cipher suites that use ephemeral elliptic curve
Diffie-Hellman (ECDHE) [RFC8422]. Clients MUST accept DHE sizes of up to
4096 bits. Endpoints MAY treat negotiation of key sizes smaller than the lower limits
as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type INADEQUATE_
9.2.2. TLS 1.2 Cipher Suites
A deployment of HTTP/2 over TLS 1.2 SHOULD NOT use any of the prohibited cipher suites listed in Appendix A.¶
Endpoints MAY choose to generate a connection
error (Section 5.4.1) of type INADEQUATE_
Implementations MUST NOT generate this error in reaction to the negotiation of a cipher suite that is not prohibited. Consequently, when clients offer a cipher suite that is not prohibited, they have to be prepared to use that cipher suite with HTTP/2.¶
The list of prohibited cipher suites includes the cipher suite that TLS 1.2 makes
mandatory, which means that TLS 1.2 deployments could have non
Note that clients might advertise support of cipher suites that are prohibited in order to allow for connection to servers that do not support HTTP/2. This allows servers to select HTTP/1.1 with a cipher suite that is prohibited in HTTP/2. However, this can result in HTTP/2 being negotiated with a prohibited cipher suite if the application protocol and cipher suite are independently selected.¶
9.2.3. TLS 1.3 Features
TLS 1.3 includes a number of features not available in earlier versions. This section discusses the use of these features.¶
HTTP/2 servers MUST NOT send post-handshake TLS 1.3 Certificate
The prohibition on post-handshake authentication applies even if the client offered the
"post_
[TLS13] defines other post-handshake messages, New
TLS early data MAY be used to send requests, provided that the guidance in [RFC8470] is observed. Clients send requests in early data assuming initial values for all server settings.¶
10. Security Considerations
The use of TLS is necessary to provide many of the security properties of this protocol. Many of the claims in this section do not hold unless TLS is used as described in Section 9.2.¶
10.2. Cross-Protocol Attacks
In a cross-protocol attack, an attacker causes a client to initiate a transaction in one protocol toward a server that understands a different protocol. An attacker might be able to cause the transaction to appear as a valid transaction in the second protocol. In combination with the capabilities of the web context, this can be used to interact with poorly protected servers in private networks.¶
Completing a TLS handshake with an ALPN identifier for HTTP/2 can be considered sufficient protection against cross-protocol attacks. ALPN provides a positive indication that a server is willing to proceed with HTTP/2, which prevents attacks on other TLS-based protocols.¶
The encryption in TLS makes it difficult for attackers to control the data that could be used in a cross-protocol attack on a cleartext protocol.¶
The cleartext version of HTTP/2 has minimal protection against cross-protocol attacks. The connection preface (Section 3.4) contains a string that is designed to confuse HTTP/1.1 servers, but no special protection is offered for other protocols.¶
10.3. Intermediary Encapsulation Attacks
HPACK permits encoding of field names and values that might be treated as delimiters in other HTTP versions. An intermediary that translates an HTTP/2 request or response MUST validate fields according to the rules in Section 8.2 before translating a message to another HTTP version. Translating a field that includes invalid delimiters could be used to cause recipients to incorrectly interpret a message, which could be exploited by an attacker.¶
Section 8.2 does not include specific rules for validation of
pseudo-header fields. If the values of these fields are used, additional validation is
necessary. This is particularly important where ":scheme", ":authority", and
":path" are combined to form a single URI string [RFC3986]. Similar problems might occur when that URI or just ":path" is
combined with ":method" to construct a request line (as in Section 3 of [HTTP/1.1]). Simple concatenation is not secure unless the input values are fully
validated.¶
An intermediary can reject fields that contain invalid field names or values for other reasons -- in particular, those fields that do not conform to the HTTP ABNF grammar from Section 5 of [HTTP]. Intermediaries that do not perform any validation of fields other than the minimum required by Section 8.2 could forward messages that contain invalid field names or values.¶
An intermediary that receives any fields that require removal before forwarding
(see Section 7.6.1 of [HTTP]) MUST remove or replace those header fields when
forwarding messages. Additionally, intermediaries should take care when forwarding messages
containing Content-Length fields to ensure that the message is well-formed (Section 8.1.1).
This ensures that if the message is translated into HTTP/1.1 at any point, the framing will be correct.¶
10.4. Cacheability of Pushed Responses
Pushed responses do not have an explicit request from the client; the request
is provided by the server in the PUSH_
Caching responses that are pushed is possible based on the guidance provided by the origin server in the Cache-Control header field. However, this can cause issues if a single server hosts more than one tenant. For example, a server might offer multiple users each a small portion of its URI space.¶
Where multiple tenants share space on the same server, that server MUST ensure that tenants are not able to push representations of resources that they do not have authority over. Failure to enforce this would allow a tenant to provide a representation that would be served out of cache, overriding the actual representation that the authoritative tenant provides.¶
Pushed responses for which an origin server is not authoritative (see Section 10.1) MUST NOT be used or cached.¶
10.5. Denial-of-Service Considerations
An HTTP/2 connection can demand a greater commitment of resources to operate than an HTTP/1.1 connection. Both field section compression and flow control depend on a commitment of a greater amount of state. Settings for these features ensure that memory commitments for these features are strictly bounded.¶
The number of PUSH_
A number of HTTP/2 implementations were found to be vulnerable to denial of service [NFLX-2019-002]. Below is a list of known ways that implementations might be
subject to denial
-
Inefficient tracking of outstanding outbound frames can lead to overload if an adversary can cause large numbers of frames to be enqueued for sending. A peer could use one of several techniques to cause large numbers of frames to be generated:¶
- Providing tiny increments to flow control in WINDOW_
UPDATE frames can cause a sender to generate a large number of DATA frames.¶ - An endpoint is required to respond to a PING frame.¶
- Each SETTINGS frame requires acknowledgment.¶
- An invalid request (or server push) can cause a peer to send RST_
STREAM frames in response.¶
- Providing tiny increments to flow control in WINDOW_
- An attacker can provide large amounts of flow-control credit at the HTTP/2 layer but withhold credit at the TCP layer, preventing frames from being sent. An endpoint that constructs and remembers frames for sending without considering TCP limits might be subject to resource exhaustion.¶
- Large numbers of small or empty frames can be abused to cause a peer to expend time processing frame headers. Caution is required here as some uses of small frames are entirely legitimate, such as the sending of an empty DATA or CONTINUATION frame at the end of a stream.¶
- The SETTINGS frame might also be abused to cause a peer to expend additional processing time. This might be done by pointlessly changing settings, sending multiple undefined settings, or changing the same setting multiple times in the same frame.¶
- Handling reprioritizatio
n with PRIORITY frames can require significant processing time and can lead to overload if many PRIORITY frames are sent.¶ - Field section compression also provides opportunities for an attacker to waste processing resources; see Section 7 of [COMPRESSION] for more details on potential abuses.¶
- Limits in SETTINGS cannot be reduced
instantaneously
, which leaves an endpoint exposed to behavior from a peer that could exceed the new limits. In particular, immediately after establishing a connection, limits set by a server are not known to clients and could be exceeded without being an obvious protocol violation.¶
Most of the features that might be exploited for denial of service -- such as SETTINGS changes, small frames, field section compression -- have legitimate uses. These features become a burden only when they are used unnecessarily or to excess.¶
An endpoint that doesn't monitor use of these features exposes itself to a risk of
denial of service. Implementations SHOULD track the use of these features and set
limits on their use. An endpoint MAY treat activity that is suspicious as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type ENHANCE_
10.5.1. Limits on Field Block Size
A large field block (Section 4.3) can cause an implementation to commit a large amount of state. Field lines that are critical for routing can appear toward the end of a field block, which prevents streaming of fields to their ultimate destination. This ordering and other reasons, such as ensuring cache correctness, mean that an endpoint might need to buffer the entire field block. Since there is no hard limit to the size of a field block, some endpoints could be forced to commit a large amount of available memory for field blocks.¶
An endpoint can use the SETTINGS_
A server that receives a larger field block than it is willing to handle can send an HTTP 431 (Request Header Fields Too Large) status code [RFC6585]. A client can discard responses that it cannot process. The field block MUST be processed to ensure a consistent connection state, unless the connection is closed.¶
10.5.2. CONNECT Issues
The CONNECT method can be used to create disproportionat
10.6. Use of Compression
Compression can allow an attacker to recover secret data when it is compressed in the same context as data under attacker control. HTTP/2 enables compression of field lines (Section 4.3); the following concerns also apply to the use of HTTP compressed content-codings (Section 8.4.1 of [HTTP]).¶
There are demonstrable attacks on compression that exploit the characteristics of the Web (e.g., [BREACH]). The attacker induces multiple requests containing varying plaintext, observing the length of the resulting ciphertext in each, which reveals a shorter length when a guess about the secret is correct.¶
Implementations communicating on a secure channel MUST NOT compress content that includes
both confidential and attacker
Further considerations regarding the compression of header fields are described in [COMPRESSION].¶
10.7. Use of Padding
Padding within HTTP/2 is not intended as a replacement for general purpose padding, such
as that provided by TLS [TLS13]. Redundant padding could even be
counterproducti
To mitigate attacks that rely on compression, disabling or limiting compression might be preferable to padding as a countermeasure.¶
Padding can be used to obscure the exact size of frame content and is provided to
mitigate specific attacks within HTTP -- for example, attacks where compressed content
includes both attacker
Use of padding can result in less protection than might seem immediately obvious. At best, padding only makes it more difficult for an attacker to infer length information by increasing the number of frames an attacker has to observe. Incorrectly implemented padding schemes can be easily defeated. In particular, randomized padding with a predictable distribution provides very little protection; similarly, padding frame payloads to a fixed size exposes information as frame payload sizes cross the fixed-sized boundary, which could be possible if an attacker can control plaintext.¶
Intermediaries SHOULD retain padding for DATA frames but MAY drop padding
for HEADERS and PUSH_
10.8. Privacy Considerations
Several characteristics of HTTP/2 provide an observer an opportunity to correlate actions of a single client or server over time. These include the values of settings, the manner in which flow-control windows are managed, the way priorities are allocated to streams, the timing of reactions to stimulus, and the handling of any features that are controlled by settings.¶
As far as these create observable differences in behavior, they could be used as a basis for fingerprinting a specific client, as defined in Section 3.2 of [PRIVACY].¶
HTTP/2's preference for using a single TCP connection allows correlation of a user's activity on a site. Reusing connections for different origins allows tracking across those origins.¶
Because the PING and SETTINGS frames solicit immediate responses, they can be used by an endpoint to measure latency to their peer. This might have privacy implications in certain scenarios.¶
10.9. Remote Timing Attacks
Remote timing attacks extract secrets from servers by observing variations in the time that servers take when processing requests that use secrets. HTTP/2 enables concurrent request creation and processing, which can give attackers better control over when request processing commences. Multiple HTTP/2 requests can be included in the same IP packet or TLS record. HTTP/2 can therefore make remote timing attacks more efficient by eliminating variability in request delivery, leaving only request order and the delivery of responses as sources of timing variability.¶
Ensuring that processing time is not dependent on the value of a secret is the best defense against any form of timing attack.¶
11. IANA Considerations
This revision of HTTP/2 marks the HTTP2-Settings header field and the
h2c upgrade token, both defined in [RFC7540], as obsolete.¶
Section 11 of [RFC7540] registered the h2 and h2c ALPN
identifiers along with the PRI HTTP method. RFC 7540 also established a registry
for frame types, settings, and error codes. These registrations and registries apply to
HTTP/2, but are not redefined in this document.¶
IANA has updated references to RFC 7540 in the
following registries to refer to this document: "TLS
ApplicationPRI method has been updated to refer to Section 3.4; all other section numbers have not
changed.¶
IANA has changed the policy on those portions of the "HTTP/2 Frame Type" and "HTTP/2 Settings" registries that were reserved for Experimental Use in RFC 7540. These portions of the registries shall operate on the same policy as the remainder of each registry.¶
11.1. HTTP2-Settings Header Field Registration
This section marks the HTTP2-Settings header field registered by Section 11.5 of [RFC7540] in the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Field Name
Registry" as obsolete. This capability has been removed: see Section 3.1.
The registration is updated to include the details as required by Section 18.4 of [HTTP]:¶
- Field Name:
- HTTP2-Settings¶
- Status:
- obsoleted¶
- Reference:
- Section 3.2.1 of [RFC7540]¶
- Comments:
- Obsolete; see Section 11.1 of this document.¶
11.2. The h2c Upgrade Token
This section records the h2c upgrade token registered by Section 11.8 of [RFC7540] in the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Upgrade Token Registry" as
obsolete. This capability has been removed: see Section 3.1. The
registration is updated as follows:¶
- Value:
- h2c¶
- Description:
- (OBSOLETE) Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2 (HTTP/2)¶
- Expected Version Tokens:
- None¶
- Reference:
- Section 3.1 of this document¶
12. References
12.1. Normative References
- [CACHING]
-
Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "HTTP Caching", STD 98, RFC 9111, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC9111 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc9111 - [COMPRESSION]
-
Peon, R. and H. Ruellan, "HPACK: Header Compression for HTTP/2", RFC 7541, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7541 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7541 - [COOKIE]
-
Barth, A., "HTTP State Management Mechanism", RFC 6265, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6265 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6265 - [HTTP]
-
Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC9110 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc9110 - [QUIC]
-
Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC9000 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc9000 - [RFC2119]
-
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC2119 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc2119 - [RFC3986]
-
Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC3986 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc3986 - [RFC8174]
-
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8174 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8174 - [RFC8422]
-
Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie
-Gonnard , "Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422, DOI 10.17487 , , <https:///RFC8422 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8422 - [RFC8470]
-
Thomson, M., Nottingham, M., and W. Tarreau, "Using Early Data in HTTP", RFC 8470, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8470 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8470 - [TCP]
-
Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC0793 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc793 - [TLS-ALPN]
-
Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan, "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application
-Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension" , RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487 , , <https:///RFC7301 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7301 - [TLS-ECDHE]
-
Rescorla, E., "TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM)", RFC 5289, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC5289 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc5289 - [TLS-EXT]
-
Eastlake 3rd, D., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions", RFC 6066, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6066 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6066 - [TLS12]
-
Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC5246 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc5246 - [TLS13]
-
Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8446 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8446 - [TLSBCP]
-
Sheffer, Y., Holz, R., and P. Saint-Andre, "Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 7525, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7525 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7525
12.2. Informative References
- [ALT-SVC]
-
Nottingham, M., McManus, P., and J. Reschke, "HTTP Alternative Services", RFC 7838, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7838 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7838 - [BREACH]
-
Gluck, Y., Harris, N., and A. Prado, "BREACH: Reviving the CRIME Attack", , <https://
breachattack >..com /resources /BREACH %20 -%20SSL, %20gone %20in %2030 %20seconds .pdf - [DNS-TERMS]
-
Hoffman, P., Sullivan, A., and K. Fujiwara, "DNS Terminology", BCP 219, RFC 8499, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8499 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8499 - [HTTP-PRIORITY]
-
Oku, K. and L. Pardue, "Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP", RFC 9218, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC9218 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc9218 - [HTTP/1.1]
-
Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "HTTP/1.1", STD 99, RFC 9112, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC9112 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc9112 - [NFLX-2019-002]
-
Netflix, "HTTP/2 Denial of Service Advisory", , <https://
github >..com /Netflix /security -bulletins /blob /master /advisories /third -party /2019 -002 .md - [PRIVACY]
-
Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J., Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6973 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6973 - [RFC1122]
-
Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC1122 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc1122 - [RFC3749]
-
Hollenbeck, S., "Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression Methods", RFC 3749, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC3749 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc3749 - [RFC6125]
-
Saint-Andre, P. and J. Hodges, "Representation and Verification of Domain-Based Application Service Identity within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificates in the Context of Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 6125, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6125 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6125 - [RFC6585]
-
Nottingham, M. and R. Fielding, "Additional HTTP Status Codes", RFC 6585, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6585 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6585 - [RFC7323]
-
Borman, D., Braden, B., Jacobson, V., and R. Scheffenegger, Ed., "TCP Extensions for High Performance", RFC 7323, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7323 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7323 - [RFC7540]
-
Belshe, M., Peon, R., and M. Thomson, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)", RFC 7540, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7540 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7540 - [RFC8441]
-
McManus, P., "Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2", RFC 8441, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8441 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8441 - [RFC8740]
-
Benjamin, D., "Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2", RFC 8740, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8740 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8740 - [TALKING]
-
Huang, L., Chen, E., Barth, A., Rescorla, E., and C. Jackson, "Talking to Yourself for Fun and Profit", , <https://
www >..adambarth .com /papers /2011 /huang -chen -barth -rescorla -jackson .pdf
Appendix A. Prohibited TLS 1.2 Cipher Suites
An HTTP/2 implementation MAY treat the negotiation of any of the following cipher suites
with TLS 1.2 as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type
INADEQUATE_
- TLS_
NULL_ WITH_ NULL_ NULL¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ NULL_ MD5¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC4_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ MD5¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC2_ CBC_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ IDEA_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC4_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ MD5¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES40_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ IDEA_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ WITH_ IDEA_ CBC_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ 40_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC2_ CBC_ 40_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC4_ 40_ SHA¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ DES_ CBC_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC2_ CBC_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
KRB5_ EXPORT_ WITH_ RC4_ 40_ MD5¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ SEED_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
EMPTY_ RENEGOTIATION_ INFO_ SCSV¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ anon_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ anon_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ anon_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ anon_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ RSA_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ DSS_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
SRP_ SHA_ DSS_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ RC4_ 128_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ 3DES_ EDE_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ NULL_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ ARIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ DSS_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DH_ anon_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ ECDSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDH_ RSA_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ GCM_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ GCM_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
DHE_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
RSA_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 128_ CBC_ SHA256¶ - TLS_
ECDHE_ PSK_ WITH_ CAMELLIA_ 256_ CBC_ SHA384¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CCM¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CCM¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CCM_ 8¶ - TLS_
RSA_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CCM_ 8¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CCM¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CCM¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 128_ CCM_ 8¶ - TLS_
PSK_ WITH_ AES_ 256_ CCM_ 8¶
For more details, see Section 9.2.2.¶
Appendix B. Changes from RFC 7540
This revision includes the following substantive changes:¶
- Use of TLS 1.3 was defined based on [RFC8740], which this document obsoletes.¶
- The priority scheme defined in RFC 7540 is deprecated. Definitions for the format of the PRIORITY frame and the priority fields in the HEADERS frame have been retained, plus the rules governing when PRIORITY frames can be sent and received, but the semantics of these fields are only described in RFC 7540. The priority signaling scheme from RFC 7540 was not successful. Using the simpler signaling in [HTTP-PRIORITY] is recommended.¶
- The HTTP/1.1 Upgrade mechanism is deprecated and no longer specified in this document. It was never widely deployed, with plaintext HTTP/2 users choosing to use the prior-knowledge implementation instead.¶
- Validation for field names and values has been narrowed. The validation that is mandatory for intermediaries is precisely defined, and error reporting for requests has been amended to encourage sending 400-series status codes.¶
- The ranges of codepoints for settings and frame types that were reserved for Experimental Use are now available for general use.¶
- Connection
-specific header fields -- which are prohibited -- are more precisely and comprehensively identified.¶ -
Hostand ":authority" are no longer permitted to disagree.¶ - Rules for sending Dynamic Table Size Update instructions after changes in settings have been clarified in Section 4.3.1.¶
Editorial changes are also included. In particular, changes to terminology and document structure are in response to updates to core HTTP semantics [HTTP]. Those documents now include some concepts that were first defined in RFC 7540, such as the 421 status code or connection coalescing.¶
Acknowledgments
Credit for non-trivial input to this document is owed to a large number of people who have contributed to the HTTP Working Group over the years. [RFC7540] contains a more extensive list of people that deserve acknowledgment for their contributions.¶
Contributors
Mike Belshe and Roberto Peon authored the text that this document is based on.¶