Repository navigation
log executeCode return values - #300
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Preview:
|
maxwellpeterson
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 21, 2026 19:28
ndisidore
reviewed
Aug 21, 2026
maxwellpeterson
force-pushed
the
mpeterson/execute-code-return-values
branch
from
August 21, 2026 19:52
bf9da6a to
60cdb65
Compare
kentonv
reviewed
Aug 25, 2026
- help kimi and other non-sota models understand that no output doesn't mean something when wrong, just that the function ran without logging or returning anything
maxwellpeterson
force-pushed
the
mpeterson/execute-code-return-values
branch
from
August 31, 2026 17:49
3148589 to
ebc13c4
Compare
|
|
- report errors that serialize to "" as uncaught exceptions instead of reporting success
|
No additional actionable findings beyond the existing return-value serialization issue. |
3 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


Kimi likes to return values when using the
executeCodetool instead of logging them. Return values are currently discarded, which causes confusion. We can automatically log them instead.This is probably a better alternative to #299
Fixes #209